These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15969838)

  • 1. The mean and variance of the selection differential after top-down selection from a mixture of normal samples.
    De Corte W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):43-54. PubMed ID: 15969838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating population or group sensitivity and its precision from a set of individual d'.
    Bi J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15969839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Chacón-Moscoso S
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):448-67. PubMed ID: 14664682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavior and analysis of 36-item Short-Form Health Survey data for surgical quality-of-life research.
    Velanovich V
    Arch Surg; 2007 May; 142(5):473-7; discussion 478. PubMed ID: 17515490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An affine invariant rank-based method for comparing dependent groups.
    Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):33-42. PubMed ID: 15969837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weak measurement invariance with respect to unmeasured variables: an implication of strict factorial invariance.
    Lubke GH; Dolan CV; Kelderman H; Mellenbergh GJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):231-48. PubMed ID: 14633334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new efficient statistical test for detecting variability in the gene expression data.
    Mathur S; Dolo S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Aug; 17(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 17698928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the probability that the sample mean is within a desired fraction of the standard deviation of the true mean.
    Schillaci MA; Schillaci ME
    J Hum Evol; 2009 Feb; 56(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 19054544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multistage index selection in finite populations.
    Norell L; Arnason T; Hugason K
    Biometrics; 1991 Mar; 47(1):205-21. PubMed ID: 2049500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Estimation of the dental status of 3- to 5-year-old children by means of cluster samples].
    Weissbach R; Herzog M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Mar; 71(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 19221982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous analysis of coupled data matrices subject to different amounts of noise.
    Wilderjans TF; Ceulemans E; Van Mechelen I; van den Berg RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):277-90. PubMed ID: 21492133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of multiple-component measuring instruments: improved evaluation in repeated measure designs.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):119-36. PubMed ID: 17535583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
    Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multilevel component analysis.
    Timmerman ME
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):301-20. PubMed ID: 17067414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2037-49. PubMed ID: 18038446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size determination for constrained longitudinal data analysis.
    Lu K; Mehrotra DV; Liu G
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):679-99. PubMed ID: 19051207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.