These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1597067)
1. Evaluating quantitative research problems. Finnick M; Haughey BP Crit Care Nurse; 1992 Jun; 12(5):98-105. PubMed ID: 1597067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating quantitative research designs: Part 1. Haughey BP Crit Care Nurse; 1994 Oct; 14(5):100-2. PubMed ID: 7859458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative vs qualitative research. Brink H Nurs RSA; 1991 Jan; 6(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 2011171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers. Lee P Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 11-17; 102(28):28-30. PubMed ID: 16869219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Instruments and methods of research]. Riv Inferm; 1997; 16(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 9510825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 10 good questions for understanding nursing research. Learn CD Beginnings; 2002; 22(1):10, 15. PubMed ID: 11842640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rigor in cross-cultural nursing research. Im EO; Page R; Lin LC; Tsai HM; Cheng CY Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Nov; 41(8):891-9. PubMed ID: 15476762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Methods and instruments of research. Analysis of various articles]. Riv Inferm; 1996; 15(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9001064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A guide to evaluating hypotheses and definitions of variables. Haughey BP Crit Care Nurse; 1992 Dec; 12(8):98-103. PubMed ID: 1288958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating quantitative research designs: Part 2. Haughey BP Crit Care Nurse; 1994 Dec; 14(6):69-72. PubMed ID: 7712803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Summary statements of the NIH Nursing Research Grant Applications. Fuller EO; Hasselmeyer EG; Hunter JC; Abdellah FG; Hinshaw AS Nurs Res; 1991; 40(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 1956813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What future for research in mental health nursing: share the objective statistics! Parsons S J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 9807359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating research: what it means to you. Maklebust J; Margolis DJ Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(4):4, 6. PubMed ID: 9306780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The discussion section of a research report. Connelly LM Medsurg Nurs; 2009; 18(5):300-1. PubMed ID: 19927967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What future for research in mental health nursing: rejoinder to Parsons, Beech and Rolfe. Gournay K; Ritter S J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 9807357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The marriage of heaven and hell: further remarks on the future for mental health research. Rolfe G J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 9807358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In response to Porter S. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60 (1), 79-86. Rolfe G J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):108-9. PubMed ID: 17824944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Thinking both inside and outside the box on measurement articles. Froman RD; Schmitt MH Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 14579254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Theoretic orientation and body of knowledge. Grant RE Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):427. PubMed ID: 2071438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]