271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15970790)
1. A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States.
Sullivan PW; Lawrence WF; Ghushchyan V
Med Care; 2005 Jul; 43(7):736-49. PubMed ID: 15970790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preference-Based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States.
Sullivan PW; Ghushchyan V
Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(4):410-20. PubMed ID: 16855129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample.
Sullivan PW; Ghushchyan V
Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(4):401-9. PubMed ID: 16855128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An off-the-shelf help list: a comprehensive catalog of preference scores from published cost-utility analyses.
Bell CM; Chapman RH; Stone PW; Sandberg EA; Neumann PJ
Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 11475385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Catalogue of EQ-5D scores for the United Kingdom.
Sullivan PW; Slejko JF; Sculpher MJ; Ghushchyan V
Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(6):800-4. PubMed ID: 21422468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specific values.
Gold MR; Franks P; McCoy KI; Fryback DG
Med Care; 1998 Jun; 36(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 9630120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EQ-5D Scores for Diabetes-Related Comorbidities.
Sullivan PW; Ghushchyan VH
Value Health; 2016 Dec; 19(8):1002-1008. PubMed ID: 27987626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of co-morbidity burden on preference-based health-related quality of life in the United States.
Sullivan PW; Ghushchyan VH; Bayliss EA
Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 May; 30(5):431-42. PubMed ID: 22452633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative disutilities of 47 risk factors and conditions assessed with seven preference-based health status measures in a national U.S. sample: toward consistency in cost-effectiveness analyses.
Franks P; Hanmer J; Fryback DG
Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):478-85. PubMed ID: 16641667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimates of Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Loss for Injuries in the United States.
Raich W; Baxter J; Sheahan M; Goldhaber-Fiebert J; Sullivan P; Hanmer J
Med Decis Making; 2023 Apr; 43(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 36482721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utilities should not be multiplied: evidence from the preference-based scores in the United States.
Fu AZ; Kattan MW
Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9):984-90. PubMed ID: 18725854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preference weights for the spectrum of alcohol use in the U.S. Population.
Chavez LJ; Bradley K; Tefft N; Liu CF; Hebert P; Devine B
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2016 Apr; 161():206-13. PubMed ID: 26900145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D index from CDC's "Healthy Days" in a US sample.
Jia H; Zack MM; Moriarty DG; Fryback DG
Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):174-85. PubMed ID: 20375418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population.
Lubetkin EI; Jia H; Franks P; Gold MR
Qual Life Res; 2005 Dec; 14(10):2187-96. PubMed ID: 16328899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale to estimate health state utility values: mapping from the MSIS-29, version 2, to the EQ-5D and the SF-6D.
Hawton A; Green C; Telford C; Zajicek J; Wright D
Value Health; 2012 Dec; 15(8):1084-91. PubMed ID: 23244811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality-of-life weights for the US population: self-reported health status and priority health conditions, by demographic characteristics.
Nyman JA; Barleen NA; Dowd BE; Russell DW; Coons SJ; Sullivan PW
Med Care; 2007 Jul; 45(7):618-28. PubMed ID: 17571010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A catalogue of EQ-5D utility weights for chronic diseases among noninstitutionalized community residents in Korea.
Kang EJ; Ko SK
Value Health; 2009; 12 Suppl 3():S114-7. PubMed ID: 20586972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index.
Hanmer J; Cherepanov D; Palta M; Kaplan RM; Feeny D; Fryback DG
Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 26314728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of obesity on diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension in the United States.
Sullivan PW; Ghushchyan VH; Ben-Joseph R
Qual Life Res; 2008 Oct; 17(8):1063-71. PubMed ID: 18777200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A National Catalog of Mapped Short-Form Six-Dimension Utility Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States From 2010 to 2015.
Song HJ; Heo JH; Wilson DL; Shao H; Park H
Value Health; 2022 Aug; 25(8):1328-1335. PubMed ID: 35367137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
