These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15971693)

  • 1. The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task.
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):301-14. PubMed ID: 15971693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency.
    Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M; Gómez P; Swaab TY
    Brain Lang; 2013 Apr; 125(1):11-27. PubMed ID: 23454070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks.
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 12713243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: the role of the item frequency of the previous trial.
    Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 12745840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
    Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.
    Frankish C; Barnes L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 17935005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision.
    Perea M; Fraga I
    Brain Lang; 2006 Apr; 97(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 16183108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Raeding with the fingres: Towards a universal model of letter position coding.
    Baciero A; Gomez P; Duñabeitia JA; Perea M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2275-2283. PubMed ID: 35650465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?
    Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1600-13. PubMed ID: 16873111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
    Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP correlates of transposed-letter priming effects: the role of vowels versus consonants.
    Carreiras M; Vergara M; Perea M
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Jan; 46(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 18992069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: are consonants processed differently from vowels?
    Carreiras M; Vergara M; Perea M
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jun; 419(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17507160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. There is no clam with coats in the calm coast: delimiting the transposed-letter priming effect.
    Duñabeitia JA; Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1930-47. PubMed ID: 19358058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition.
    Duñabeitia JA; Perea M; Carreiras M
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 17217942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement.
    Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):547-76. PubMed ID: 17250820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of consonant/vowel organization in perceptual discrimination.
    Chetail F; Drabs V; Content A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):938-61. PubMed ID: 24749964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography?
    Burani C; Marcolini S; Stella G
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):568-86. PubMed ID: 12081423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.