BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15972422)

  • 1. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.
    Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robustness of computerized identification of masses in digitized mammograms. A preliminary assessment.
    Chang YH; Zheng B; Gur D
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Sep; 31(9):563-8. PubMed ID: 8877493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mass detection in digitized mammograms using two independent computer-assisted diagnosis schemes.
    Zheng B; Chang YH; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Dec; 167(6):1421-4. PubMed ID: 8956570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.
    Wang X; Li L; Xu W; Liu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided detection schemes: the effect of limiting the number of cued regions in each case.
    Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams G; Shindel B; Catullo V; Good WF; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 14975949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment initial experience.
    Zheng B; Hardesty LA; Poller WR; Sumkin JH; Golla S
    Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 12759470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerized identification of suspicious regions for masses in digitized mammograms.
    Chang YH; Zheng B; Gur D
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 8675422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis.
    Zheng B; Chang YH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Nov; 2(11):959-66. PubMed ID: 9419667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.
    Zheng B; Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1401-8. PubMed ID: 20650667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment.
    Gur D; Stalder JS; Hardesty LA; Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Chough DM; Shindel BE; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 15358846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.
    Park SC; Pu J; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 19201355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Chang YH; Staiger M; Good W; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 9419620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Matching breast masses depicted on different views a comparison of three methods.
    Zheng B; Tan J; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1338-47. PubMed ID: 19632867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms.
    Tourassi GD; Harrawood B; Singh S; Lo JY; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 17278499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings.
    Zheng B; Ganott MA; Britton CA; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Chang TS; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 11719657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images.
    Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Metz CE; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(5):955-63. PubMed ID: 1961160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying computer-assisted detection schemes to digitized mammograms after JPEG data compression: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Good WF; Maitz GS; Chang YH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Aug; 7(8):595-602. PubMed ID: 10952109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.