These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1597291)
1. Problems related to diffuse versus localized loss in the perimetry of glaucomatous visual fields. Funkhouser AT; Fankhauser F; Weale RA Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 1597291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of five methods for estimating general glaucomatous visual field depression. Funkhouser A; Flammer J; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner HP Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 1577286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new diffuse loss index for estimating general glaucomatous visual field depression. Funkhouser AT Doc Ophthalmol; 1991; 77(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 1752191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Wishart PK Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields. Birch MK; Wishart PK; O'Donnell NP Ophthalmology; 1995 Aug; 102(8):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. PubMed ID: 9097752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Sponsel WE; Arango S; Trigo Y; Mensah J Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):830-6. PubMed ID: 9645720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffuse visual field loss and glaucoma. Asman P; Heijl A Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1994 Jun; 72(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 7976259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry. Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 8489448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffuse and localized glaucomatous field loss in light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry. Lachenmayr BJ; Drance SM; Chauhan BC; House PH; Lalani S Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1991; 229(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 1869065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28 degrees of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter). Funkhouser AT; Fankhauser F Int Ophthalmol; 1991 Sep; 15(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 1743870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Size threshold perimetry performs as well as conventional automated perimetry with stimulus sizes III, V, and VI for glaucomatous loss. Wall M; Doyle CK; Eden T; Zamba KD; Johnson CA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 54(6):3975-83. PubMed ID: 23633660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total deviation probability plots for stimulus size v perimetry: a comparison with size III stimuli. Wall M; Brito CF; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Kardon RH; Johnson CA Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 Apr; 126(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 18413515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Delgado MF; Nguyen NT; Cox TA; Singh K; Lee DA; Dueker DK; Fechtner RD; Juzych MS; Lin SC; Netland PA; Pastor SA; Schuman JS; Samples JR; Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss. Grewal DS; Sehi M; Greenfield DS Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 127(11):1442-8. PubMed ID: 19901209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. Bayer AU; Erb C Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]