These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15972931)

  • 1. Increasing response to mailed questionnaires by including a pencil/pen.
    White E; Carney PA; Kolar AS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 15972931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: "Increasing response to mailed questionnaires by including a pencil/pen".
    Sacco P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 164(3):296. PubMed ID: 16777928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of a college pen incentive on survey response rate among recent college graduates.
    Stange JP; Zyzanski SJ
    Eval Rev; 2011 Feb; 35(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 21362640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of various mailing strategies among nonrespondents in a prospective cohort study.
    Rimm EB; Stampfer MJ; Colditz GA; Giovannucci E; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jun; 131(6):1068-71. PubMed ID: 2343859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey.
    Perneger TV; Etter JF; Rougemont A
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 138(9):714-22. PubMed ID: 8237986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.
    Gibson PJ; Koepsell TD; Diehr P; Hale C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 149(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 10355382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tone of postcards in increasing survey response rates.
    Price JH; Yingling F; Walsh E; Murnan J; Dake JA
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Apr; 94(2):444-8. PubMed ID: 15154170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mailed survey follow-ups--are postcard reminders more cost-effective than second questionnaires?
    Becker H; Cookston J; Kulberg V
    West J Nurs Res; 2000 Aug; 22(5):642-7. PubMed ID: 10943176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires.
    Halpern SD; Ubel PA; Berlin JA; Asch DA
    Med Care; 2002 Sep; 40(9):834-9. PubMed ID: 12218773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts.
    Spry VM; Hovell MF; Sallis JG; Hofsteter CR; Elder JP; Molgaard CA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Jul; 130(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 2741903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of incentives and follow-up on increasing survey response rates and participation in field studies.
    Smith MG; Witte M; Rocha S; Basner M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):230. PubMed ID: 31805869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.
    Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods for improving response to a mailed questionnaire.
    Doody MM; Sigurdson AS; Kampa D; Chimes K; Alexander BH; Ron E; Tarone RE; Linet MS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 157(7):643-51. PubMed ID: 12672684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire.
    Hoffman SC; Burke AE; Helzlsouer KJ; Comstock GW
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 148(10):1007-11. PubMed ID: 9829873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prenotification had no additional effect on the response rate and survey quality: a randomized trial.
    Xie Y; Ho SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1422-6. PubMed ID: 23742789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect on survey return rates of having a signed or unsigned postcard as the third-wave mailing.
    Price JH; Dake JA; Akpanudo S; Kleinfelder J
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 2):1099-102. PubMed ID: 12931924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of small monetary incentives to convert survey non-respondents: a randomized control trial.
    Griffin JM; Simon AB; Hulbert E; Stevenson J; Grill JP; Noorbaloochi S; Partin MR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():81. PubMed ID: 21615955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased response proportions for postal questionnaires in Texas veterinarians using incentives.
    Bhattarai B; Fosgate GT
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Jan; 93(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 19931927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mailing strategies and recruitment into an intervention trial of the exercise effect on breast cancer biomarkers.
    Tworoger SS; Yasui Y; Ulrich CM; Nakamura H; LaCroix K; Johnston R; McTiernan A
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 11815403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
    Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.