These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15972931)

  • 21. Questionnaire color and response rates to mailed surveys. A randomized trial and a meta-analysis.
    Etter JF; Cucherat M; Perneger TV
    Eval Health Prof; 2002 Jun; 25(2):185-99. PubMed ID: 12026752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Third mailings in epidemiological studies: are they really necessary?
    Elliott AM; Hannaford PC
    Fam Pract; 2003 Oct; 20(5):592-4. PubMed ID: 14507804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Initial nonresponders had an increased response rate after repeated questionnaire mailings.
    Wensing M; Schattenberg G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):959-61. PubMed ID: 16085200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire.
    Whiteman MK; Langenberg P; Kjerulff K; McCarter R; Flaws JA
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):821-8. PubMed ID: 14588132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect on response of including a lottery incentive in health surveys [ISRCTN32203485].
    Roberts LM; Wilson S; Roalfe A; Bridge P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):30. PubMed ID: 15533256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of tracking responses and the day of mailing on physician survey response rate: three randomized trials.
    Akl EA; Gaddam S; Mustafa R; Wilson MC; Symons A; Grifasi A; McGuigan D; Schünemann HJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16942. PubMed ID: 21373197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors influencing the effectiveness of mailed health surveys.
    Gilbert GH; Longmate J; Branch LG
    Public Health Rep; 1992; 107(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 1410240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Getting a Valid Survey Response From 662 Plastic Surgeons in the 21st Century.
    Reinisch JF; Yu DC; Li WY
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 76(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 26418779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians.
    Everett SA; Price JH; Bedell AW; Telljohann SK
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Jun; 20(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 10183321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dentists' response to financial incentives in a mail survey of malpractice liability experience.
    Fiset L; Milgrom P; Tarnai J
    J Public Health Dent; 1994; 54(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 8046692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Enclosing a pen reduced time to response to questionnaire mailings.
    Bell K; Clark L; Fairhurst C; Mitchell N; Lenaghan E; Blacklock J; Cushnaghan J; Cooper C; Gittoes N; O'Neill TW; Shepstone L; Torgerson DJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():144-50. PubMed ID: 26738971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Efforts to increase the response to mailed questionnaires].
    Finsen V
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2011 Jan; 173(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 21199620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Maximising response to postal questionnaires--a systematic review of randomised trials in health research.
    Nakash RA; Hutton JL; Jørstad-Stein EC; Gates S; Lamb SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():5. PubMed ID: 16504090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Response rates and non-response bias in a health-related mailed survey].
    Nakai S; Hashimoto S; Murakami Y; Hayashi M; Manabe K; Noda H
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1997 Mar; 44(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 9175409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of multiple reminders on response patterns in a Danish health survey.
    Christensen AI; Ekholm O; Kristensen PL; Larsen FB; Vinding AL; Glümer C; Juel K
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Feb; 25(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 24855288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of a gift certificate incentive and specialized delivery on prostate cancer survivors' response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized-controlled trial.
    Bakan J; Chen B; Medeiros-Nancarrow C; Hu JC; Kantoff PW; Recklitis CJ
    J Geriatr Oncol; 2014 Apr; 5(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 24495697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget. A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives.
    Asch DA; Christakis NA; Ubel PA
    Med Care; 1998 Jan; 36(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 9431335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
    Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.
    Robertson J; Walkom EJ; McGettigan P
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Aug; 14(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 15937989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.