BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15973104)

  • 1. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision.
    Marr R; Birbeck K; Garvican J; Macklin CP; Tiffin NJ; Parsons WJ; Dixon MF; Mapstone NP; Sebag-Montefiore D; Scott N; Johnston D; Sagar P; Finan P; Quirke P
    Ann Surg; 2005 Jul; 242(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 15973104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
    den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
    Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients.
    Law WL; Chu KW
    Ann Surg; 2004 Aug; 240(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 15273550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.
    Zaheer S; Pemberton JH; Farouk R; Dozois RR; Wolff BG; Ilstrup D
    Ann Surg; 1998 Jun; 227(6):800-11. PubMed ID: 9637543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of circumferential resection margins on survival following rectal cancer surgery.
    Mois E; Graur F; Hajjar NA; Puia C; Cote A; Zaharie F; Bartos A; Momani NA; Pop F; Neagos H; Ciorogar G; Iancu C
    Ann Ital Chir; 2017; 88():. PubMed ID: 27941239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.
    Hiranyakas A; da Silva G; Wexner SD; Ho YH; Allende D; Berho M
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Mar; 15(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 22776435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
    Birbeck KF; Macklin CP; Tiffin NJ; Parsons W; Dixon MF; Mapstone NP; Abbott CR; Scott N; Finan PJ; Johnston D; Quirke P
    Ann Surg; 2002 Apr; 235(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 11923599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examination of outcome following abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma in Oxford.
    Chambers W; Khan A; Waters R; Lindsey I; George B; Mortensen N; Cunningham C
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 Dec; 12(12):1192-7. PubMed ID: 19519690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term prognostic value of mesorectal grading after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.
    Madbouly KM; Hussein AM; Abdelzaher E
    Am J Surg; 2014 Sep; 208(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 24581995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cancer.
    Liu P; Bao H; Zhang X; Zhang J; Ma L; Wang Y; Li C; Wang Z; Gong P
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():39. PubMed ID: 25889121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the prognostic factors for low rectal cancer with the pT1-2NxM0 stage after abdominoperineal resection.
    Zhang XM; Ma C; Sun DY; Wang Z; Zhou ZX
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Jan; 27(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 25426977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer.
    den Dulk M; Putter H; Collette L; Marijnen CAM; Folkesson J; Bosset JF; Rödel C; Bujko K; Påhlman L; van de Velde CJH
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 May; 45(7):1175-1183. PubMed ID: 19128956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Local recurrence following abdominoperineal excision and anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.
    Amato A; Pescatori M; Butti A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1991 Apr; 34(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 2007349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
    Raftopoulos I; Reed JF; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 21689315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sparing Sphincters and Laparoscopic Resection Improve Survival by Optimizing the Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Patients.
    Keskin M; Bayraktar A; Sivirikoz E; Yegen G; Karip B; Saglam E; Bulut MT; Balik E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(5):e2669. PubMed ID: 26844498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of tumor recurrence between laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation and laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.
    Liang JT; Cheng JC; Huang KC; Lai HS; Sun CT
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Sep; 27(9):3452-64. PubMed ID: 23508815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of treatment of distal rectal carcinoma since the introduction of total mesorectal excision: a single unit experience, 1994-2003.
    Chiappa A; Biffi R; Zbar AP; Luca F; Crotti C; Bertani E; Biella F; Zampino G; Orecchia R; Fazio N; Venturino M; Crosta C; Pruneri GC; Grassi C; Andreoni B
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 20(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 15602647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer.
    Caycedo-Marulanda A; Lee L; Chadi SA; Verschoor CP; Crosina J; Ashamalla S; Brown CJ;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2036330. PubMed ID: 33533932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
    Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.