106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15973533)
1. The appropriateness of swab cultures for the release of human allograft tissue.
Ronholdt CJ; Bogdansky S
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 32(8):349-54. PubMed ID: 15973533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of two types of swabs for sampling allograft musculoskeletal tissue.
Varettas K
ANZ J Surg; 2015 Jan; 85(1-2):33-7. PubMed ID: 24811144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of bioburden on human and animal tissues: part 2--results of testing of human tissue and qualification of a composite sample for routine bioburden determination.
Kowalski JB; Merritt K; Gocke D; Osborne J
Cell Tissue Bank; 2012 Aug; 13(3):431-9. PubMed ID: 22328024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Swab or biopsy samples for bioburden testing of allograft musculoskeletal tissue?
Varettas K
Cell Tissue Bank; 2014 Dec; 15(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24599706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Easy-Flow Copan Liquid Stuart's and Starplex Swab transport systems for recovery of fastidious aerobic bacteria.
Drake C; Barenfanger J; Lawhorn J; Verhulst S
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Mar; 43(3):1301-3. PubMed ID: 15750099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of two microbial detection methods used in aseptic processing of musculoskeletal allograft tissues.
Dennis JA; Martinez OV; Landy DC; Malinin TI; Morris PR; Fox WP; Buck BE; Temple HT
Cell Tissue Bank; 2011 Feb; 12(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 19806469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of swab transport systems for aerobic and anaerobic organism recovery.
Perry JL
J Clin Microbiol; 1997 May; 35(5):1269-71. PubMed ID: 9114423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sponge swabs increase sensitivity of sterility testing of processed bone and tendon allografts.
Nguyen H; Morgan DA; Cull S; Benkovich M; Forwood MR
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1127-32. PubMed ID: 21603957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbiological screening of post-mortem bone donors - two case reports.
Vehmeyer SB; Bloem RM; Petit PL
J Hosp Infect; 2001 Mar; 47(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 11247679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microbiological assessment of arterial allografts processed in a tissue bank.
Mirabet V; Arrébola M; Briones J; Bosch MP; Ocete MD; Melero A; Mirabet S; Aranda L; Guillot AJ; Larrea LR; Escobedo-Lucea C; Pemán J
Cell Tissue Bank; 2021 Dec; 22(4):539-549. PubMed ID: 34549351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Augmented recovery of microorganisms from swabs by homogenization: a novel standardizable high-throughput approach.
Warnke P; Redanz S; Zaatreh S; Podbielski A
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Jan; 84(1):16-18. PubMed ID: 26514077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of microbiological culture methods in screening allograft tissue. Swab versus nutrient broth.
Saegeman VS; Lismont D; Verduyckt B; Ectors NL; Verhaegen J
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Aug; 70(2):374-8. PubMed ID: 17582530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity and negative predictive value of swab cultures in musculoskeletal allograft procurement.
Veen MR; Bloem RM; Petit PL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Mar; (300):259-63. PubMed ID: 8131346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and microbial impact of screening kidney allograft preservative solution for bacterial contamination with high-sensitivity methods.
Bertrand D; Pallet N; Sartorius A; Zahar JR; Soussan RS; Lortholary O; Legendre C; Mamzer MF
Transpl Int; 2013 Aug; 26(8):795-9. PubMed ID: 23734610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening femoral heads from living donors: a prospective study comparing swab-agar versus bone fragment-broth culture.
Saegeman V; Verhaegen J; Simon JP
Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Jun; 77(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 21846008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Broth versus solid agar culture of swab samples of cadaveric allograft musculoskeletal tissue.
Varettas K
Cell Tissue Bank; 2013 Dec; 14(4):627-31. PubMed ID: 23378168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of Single and Pooled Manure Drag Swabs for the Detection of Salmonella Serovar Enteritidis in Commercial Poultry Houses.
Kinde H; Goodluck HA; Pitesky M; Friend TD; Campbell JA; Hill AE
Avian Dis; 2015 Dec; 59(4):548-53. PubMed ID: 26629631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tissue recovery practices and bioburden: a systematic review.
Brubaker S; Lotherington K; Zhao J; Hamilton B; Rockl G; Duong A; Garibaldi A; Simunovic N; Alsop D; Dao D; Bessemer R; Ayeni OR;
Cell Tissue Bank; 2016 Dec; 17(4):561-571. PubMed ID: 27761677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of sonication of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices to enhance microbial detection.
Nagpal A; Patel R; Greenwood-Quaintance KE; Baddour LM; Lynch DT; Lahr BD; Maleszewski JJ; Friedman PA; Hayes DL; Sohail MR
Am J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 115(7):912-7. PubMed ID: 25779615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of swab PCR as an alternative to tissue culture methods for diagnosing infections associated with fracture fixation devices.
Omar M; Suero EM; Liodakis E; Reichling M; Guenther D; Decker S; Stiesch M; Krettek C; Eberhard J
Injury; 2016 Jul; 47(7):1421-6. PubMed ID: 27181839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
