141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15973597)
21. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
Fauber TL
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography.
Toroi P; Nieminen MT; Tenkanen-Rautakoski P; Varjonen M
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3865-79. PubMed ID: 19491454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Application of European protocol in the evaluation of contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose for two digital mammography systems.
Muhogora WE; Devetti A; Padovani R; Msaki P; Bonutti F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):231-6. PubMed ID: 18283065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optical density changes in dry-processed films.
Al Khalifah K; Brindhaban A; Al Baloul G; Al Bather F; Abdulgafoor M
Radiol Technol; 2007; 79(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 17848529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
Tsalafoutas OA; Kolovos CA; Tsapaki V; Betsou S; Koliakou E; Maniatis PN; Xenofos S
Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of dual-energy subtraction of digital mammography images under conditions found in a commercial unit.
Brandan ME; Ramírez-R V
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2307-20. PubMed ID: 16625044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Quality assurance of digital mammography X-ray system].
Hu X; Lu G
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Apr; 35(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 20448366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Digital mammography: performance evaluation parameters and available systems in France].
Stines J; Noel A; Heid P
J Radiol; 2007; 88(7-8 Pt 1):933-42. PubMed ID: 17878849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.
Bosmans H; Carton AK; Rogge F; Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Nijs K; Van Steen A; Marchal G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Documentation of digital image information--video or laser imager?].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Loose R; Jaschke W; Georgi M
Rofo; 1988 Jul; 149(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 2840718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The current status of full-field digital mammography quality control.
Williams MB; Goodale PJ; Butler PF
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):936-51. PubMed ID: 17411736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hazard Report. Interpretation errors or repeat exposures may be caused by difficulty in correcting information on Hologic Selenia digital mammography systems.
Health Devices; 2009 Mar; 38(3):92-3. PubMed ID: 19580097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Image quality of film transparency printer output of digital dental radiographs.
Sakurai T; Matsumoto Y; Onoyama K; Kawamata R; Kashima I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 15772599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Documentation of medical images using a laser camera].
Weberling R
Rontgenblatter; 1989 Apr; 42(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 2711107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital x-ray: unwavering commitment collides with monumental challenges.
Freiherr G
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D4-7. PubMed ID: 10724732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Quality control of laser imagers].
Winkelbauer F; Ammann M; Gerstner N; Imhof H
Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):334-8. PubMed ID: 1457474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Monthly monitoring program on DryView laser imager: one year experience on five Imation units.
Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; Terilli T
Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1817-21. PubMed ID: 10505869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
