440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15973949)
1. Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: an experimental study.
Hoffmann J; Westendorff C; Schneider M; Reinert S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 15973949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the accuracy of invasive and noninvasive registration methods for image-guided oral implant surgery.
Widmann G; Stoffner R; Schullian P; Widmann R; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Puelacher W; Bale RJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 20556247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model.
Hoffmann J; Westendorff C; Gomez-Roman G; Reinert S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 16164469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted surgery in the edentulous jaw based on 3 fixed intraoral reference points.
Widmann G; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Stoffner R; Longato S; Bale R; Puelacher W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1140-7. PubMed ID: 20156663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a surgical navigation system for CT-guided template production.
Widmann G; Widmann R; Widmann E; Jaschke W; Bale R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 17340899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.
Horwitz J; Zuabi O; Machtei EE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Registration using three-dimensional laser surface scanning for navigation in oral and craniomaxillofacial surgery].
Troitzsch D; Hoffmann J; Dammann F; Bartz D; Reinert S
Zentralbl Chir; 2003 Jul; 128(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 12884140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems.
Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Birkfellner W; Enislidis G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):785-90. PubMed ID: 17974114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.
Fortin T; Bosson JL; Coudert JL; Isidori M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 14696665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Navigated pedicle screw placement: experimental comparison between CT- and 3D fluoroscopy-based techniques.
Geerling J; Gösling T; Gösling A; Ortega G; Kendoff D; Citak M; Krettek C; Hüfner T
Comput Aided Surg; 2008 May; 13(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 18432415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increase of accuracy in intraoperative navigation through high-resolution flat-panel volume computed tomography: experimental comparison with multislice computed tomography-based navigation.
Bartling SH; Leinung M; Graute J; Rodt T; Dullin C; Becker H; Lenarz T; Stover T; Majdani O
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 17195752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy evaluation of direct navigation with an isocentric 3D rotational X-ray system.
van de Kraats EB; van Walsum T; Kendrick L; Noordhoek NJ; Niessen WJ
Med Image Anal; 2006 Apr; 10(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 16099196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of a laboratory-based computer implant guiding system.
Barnea E; Alt I; Kolerman R; Nissan J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 20416521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multipurpose navigation system-based concept for surgical template production.
Widmann G; Widmann R; Stoffner R; Widmann E; Rieger T; Remensberger S; Grubwieser G; Puelacher W; Bale R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 May; 67(5):1113-20. PubMed ID: 19375026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical navigation in oral implantology.
Miller RJ; Bier J
Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 16569960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative navigation in the maxillofacial area based on 3D imaging obtained by a cone-beam device.
Mischkowski RA; Zinser MJ; Ritter L; Neugebauer J; Keeve E; Zöller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 36(8):687-94. PubMed ID: 17560082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct navigation on 3D rotational x-ray data acquired with a mobile propeller C-arm: accuracy and application in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
van de Kraats EB; Carelsen B; Fokkens WJ; Boon SN; Noordhoek N; Niessen WJ; van Walsum T
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5769-81. PubMed ID: 16333154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve].
Bové JC
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 18456060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
