191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15974168)
1. Assisted reproductive technology: 25 years of progress.
Forman R
Hosp Med; 2005 Jun; 66(6):356-9. PubMed ID: 15974168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Paternal age and assisted reproductive technology outcome in ovum recipients.
Luna M; Finkler E; Barritt J; Bar-Chama N; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Grunfeld L
Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1772-5. PubMed ID: 19539905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technologies in South Dakota: the first ten years.
Brannian J; Hansen K
S D Med; 2006 Jul; 59(7):291-3. PubMed ID: 16895051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A controversial definition of the limitations on reproductive medicine in Germany].
Kentenich H; Utz-Billing I
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(9-10):659-65; discussion 676, 724. PubMed ID: 17269501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current status of the approach to assisted reproduction.
Pauli SA; Berga SL; Shang W; Session DR
Pediatr Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 56(3):467-88, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19501687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cryopreservation in assisted reproduction: milestones and future challenges.
Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):263. PubMed ID: 21782052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A renaissance in reproductive endocrinology and infertility.
Barbieri RL
Fertil Steril; 2005 Sep; 84(3):576-7; discussion 583. PubMed ID: 16169385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends and factors associated with the Day 5 embryo transfer, assisted reproductive technology surveillance, USA, 2001-2009.
Marsh CA; Farr SL; Chang J; Kissin DM; Grainger DA; Posner SF; Macaluso M; Jamieson DJ
Hum Reprod; 2012 Aug; 27(8):2325-31. PubMed ID: 22627658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Innovations in assisted reproductive technologies: impact on contemporary donor egg practice and future advances.
Christianson MS; Bellver J
Fertil Steril; 2018 Nov; 110(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 30396567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Right to assisted reproductive technology: overcoming infertility in low-resource countries.
Inhorn MC
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Aug; 106(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 19539927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Female obesity adversely affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy and live birth rates.
Luke B; Brown MB; Stern JE; Missmer SA; Fujimoto VY; Leach R;
Hum Reprod; 2011 Jan; 26(1):245-52. PubMed ID: 21071489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted reproductive technology: moving forward--or just moving?
Cedars MI
Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):588-589. PubMed ID: 26851766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Fertilization therapies in Finland].
Tiitinen A; Hovatta O; Kujansuu E; Gissler M; Koskimies AI
Duodecim; 1998; 114(21):2219-24. PubMed ID: 11757112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Common etiologies of infertility and an evidence-based approach to their treatment. Preface.
Bates GW
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 39(4):xiii-xiv. PubMed ID: 23182563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Yeh JS; Steward RG; Dude AM; Shah AA; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 24842672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted reproductive technology: both sides now.
Cheung AP
J Reprod Med; 2006 Apr; 51(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 16739266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Introduction: Application of genetic advances to assisted reproduction technologies.
Carrell DT; Krausz C
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Apr; 16(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 18413054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted reproductive technology has been detrimental to academic reproductive endocrinology and infertility.
Soules MR
Fertil Steril; 2005 Sep; 84(3):570-2. PubMed ID: 16169383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Frattarelli JL; Miller KA; Miller BT; Elkind-Hirsch K; Scott RT
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17765235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos.
Riggs R; Mayer J; Dowling-Lacey D; Chi TF; Jones E; Oehninger S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 19027110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
