These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15974227)
21. Beyond sponges: Safe practices for avoiding all RSIs. Wood E OR Manager; 2016 Jul; 32(7):13-5. PubMed ID: 27509691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Seeking responsibility for the lost swab? Search elsewhere. Wheeler R; Blackburn S; Biggs H Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2014 Apr; 96(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 24780778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gauze pad left in pt. during reversal of tubal ligation surgery. Case on point: Houserman v. Garrett, 2004 WL 2829112. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Dec; 45(7):4. PubMed ID: 15675762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Back to Basics: Counting Soft Surgical Goods. Spruce L AORN J; 2016 Mar; 103(3):298-301; quiz 302-3. PubMed ID: 26924368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Higher awareness may lower the odds of retained surgical items. OR Manager; 2013 May; 29(5):18-21. PubMed ID: 23755467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Retained surgical sponges, needles and instruments. Hariharan D; Lobo DN Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2013 Mar; 95(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 23484986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The recurring problem of retained swabs and instruments. Mahran MA; Toeima E; Morris EP Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 23578840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Governing the surgical count through communication interactions: implications for patient safety. Riley R; Manias E; Polglase A Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Oct; 15(5):369-74. PubMed ID: 17074876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Trauma: when there's no time to count. Murdock D AORN J; 2008 Feb; 87(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 18323023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. SURGICAL COUNTING: A PERIOPERATIVE NURSE'S PERSPECTIVE. Warwick V; Gillespie B Aust Nurs Midwifery J; 2017 May; 24(10):39. PubMed ID: 29280599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A system-wide initiative to prevent retained vaginal sponges. Chagolla BA; Gibbs VC; Keats JP; Pelletreau B MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2011; 36(5):312-7. PubMed ID: 21857202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A historical perspective on the problem of the retained surgical sponge: Have we really come that far? Cima RR; Newman JS Surgery; 2021 Jul; 170(1):146-152. PubMed ID: 33648769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The duty of care 2: risk assessment and risk management. Fullbrook S Br J Nurs; 2007 Jan 25-Feb 7; 16(2):112-3. PubMed ID: 17353822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implementation of a protocol to reduce occurrence of retained sponges after vaginal delivery. Lutgendorf MA; Schindler LL; Hill JB; Magann EF; O'Boyle JD Mil Med; 2011 Jun; 176(6):702-4. PubMed ID: 21702393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. Gawande AA; Studdert DM; Orav EJ; Brennan TA; Zinner MJ N Engl J Med; 2003 Jan; 348(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 12529464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Legal case briefs for nurses. IA: unattended pt. falls in bathroom: "routine nonmedicale care" standard applied; OR: nurses state "all sponges ... removed": court rejects "captain of ship" doctrine. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Nov; 34(6):3. PubMed ID: 8265796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]