These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15974353)

  • 1. Choral reading with filtered speech: effect on stuttering.
    Rami MK; Kalinowski J; Rastatter MP; Holbert D; Allen M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):421-31. PubMed ID: 15974353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of reading with reversed speech on frequency of stuttering in adults.
    Rami MK; Diederich E
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 15974349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissecting choral speech: properties of the accompanist critical to stuttering reduction.
    Kiefte M; Armson J
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 17418860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gestural recovery and the role of forward and reversed syllabic repetitions as stuttering inhibitors in adults.
    Kalinowski J; Saltuklaroglu T; Guntupalli V; Stuart A
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Jun; 363(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 15172103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Envelope modulation spectral (EMS) analyses of solo reading and choral reading conditions suggest changes in speech rhythm in adults who stutter.
    Dechamma D; Maruthy S
    J Fluency Disord; 2018 Dec; 58():47-60. PubMed ID: 30220404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons of stuttering frequency during and after speech initiation in unaltered feedback, altered auditory feedback and choral speech conditions.
    Saltuklaroglu T; Kalinowski J; Robbins M; Crawcour S; Bowers A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(6):1000-17. PubMed ID: 19294550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Autonomic arousal in adults who stutter prior to various reading tasks intended to elicit changes in stuttering frequency.
    Bowers A; Saltuklaroglu T; Kalinowski J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 22044550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Echo reading and stuttering].
    Le Huche F; Charpy N
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(5):332-3. PubMed ID: 12741297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Say it with me: stuttering inhibited.
    Saltuklaroglu T; Dayalu VN; Kalinowski J; Stuart A; Rastatter MP
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Apr; 26(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 15202536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of continuous speech and non-speech signals on stuttering frequency in adults who stutter.
    Dayalu VN; Guntupalli VK; Kalinowski J; Stuart A; Saltuklaroglu T; Rastatter MP
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Oct; 36(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 21385148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stuttering inhibition via visual feedback at normal and fast speech rates.
    Hudock D; Dayalu VN; Saltuklaroglu T; Stuart A; Zhang J; Kalinowski J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 21401815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological variables in choral reading.
    Poore MA; Ferguson SH
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Jan; 22(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 18092217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple and effective treatment for stuttering: speech practice without audience.
    Yamada J; Homma T
    Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(6):1196-9. PubMed ID: 17512678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel tactile feedback to reduce overt stuttering.
    Waddell DE; Goggans PM; Snyder GJ
    Neuroreport; 2012 Aug; 23(12):727-30. PubMed ID: 22776903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of self-generated synchronous and asynchronous visual speech feedback on overt stuttering frequency.
    Snyder GJ; Hough MS; Blanchet P; Ivy LJ; Waddell D
    J Commun Disord; 2009; 42(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 19304293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate effects of AAF devices on the characteristics of stuttering: a clinical analysis.
    Unger JP; Glück CW; Cholewa J
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Jun; 37(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 22531287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inducement of fluent speech in persons who stutter via visual choral speech.
    Kalinowski J; Stuart A; Rastatter MP; Snyder G; Dayalu V
    Neurosci Lett; 2000 Mar; 281(2-3):198-200. PubMed ID: 10704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An experimental investigation of the effect of altered auditory feedback on the conversational speech of adults who stutter.
    Lincoln M; Packman A; Onslow M; Jones M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1122-31. PubMed ID: 20220025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech effort measurement and stuttering: investigating the chorus reading effect.
    Ingham RJ; Warner A; Byrd A; Cotton J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):660-70. PubMed ID: 16787903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: one-year follow-up.
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J; Saltuklaroglu T; Guntupalli VK
    Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 28(12):757-65. PubMed ID: 16754573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.