215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15974840)
41. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 20350159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cardaropoli D; Tamagnone L; Roffredo A; Gaveglio L
J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 21721988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Root coverage in isolated gingival recessions using autograft versus allograft: a pilot study.
Joly JC; Carvalho AM; da Silva RC; Ciotti DL; Cury PR
J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):1017-22. PubMed ID: 17539714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Management of gingival recession by the use of an acellular dermal graft material: a 12-case series.
Santos A; Goumenos G; Pascual A
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1982-90. PubMed ID: 16274319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Modified coronally advanced flap associated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions.
Carvalho PF; da Silva RC; Cury PR; Joly JC
J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1901-6. PubMed ID: 17076617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Clinical evaluation of 3 techniques to augment keratinized tissue without root coverage.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):932-8. PubMed ID: 11495142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Root coverage with an acellular dermal allograft: a three-month case report.
Fowler EB; Breault LG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2000 Aug; 1(3):47-59. PubMed ID: 12167882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Does placement of a connective tissue graft improve the outcomes of coronally advanced flap for coverage of single gingival recessions in upper anterior teeth? A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.
Cortellini P; Tonetti M; Baldi C; Francetti L; Rasperini G; Rotundo R; Nieri M; Franceschi D; Labriola A; Prato GP
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 19046326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A comparison of three techniques to obtain root coverage on mandibular incisors.
Harris RJ; Miller LH; Harris CR; Miller RJ
J Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 76(10):1758-67. PubMed ID: 16253099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of periodontal applications of a living tissue-engineered human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute. II. Comparison to the subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled feasibility study.
Wilson TG; McGuire MK; Nunn ME
J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):881-9. PubMed ID: 15948681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A promising periodontal procedure for the treatment of adjacent gingival recession defects.
Tözüm TF
J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 12622879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Creeping attachment: autogenous graft vs dermal matrix allograft.
Haeri A; Parsell D
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Sep; 21(9):725-9; quiz 730. PubMed ID: 11199646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Connective tissue-bone onlay graft with enamel matrix derivative for treatment of gingival recession: a case report.
Nozawa T; Sugiyama T; Satoh T; Tanaka K; Enomoto H; Ito K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12516827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparative histologic analysis of coronally advanced flap with and without collagen membrane for root coverage.
Lee EJ; Meraw SJ; Oh TJ; Giannobile WV; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2002 Jul; 73(7):779-88. PubMed ID: 12146538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):734-43. PubMed ID: 15212356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Use of the tunnel technique and an acellular dermal matrix in the treatment of multiple adjacent teeth with gingival recession in the esthetic zone.
Mahn DH
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Dec; 30(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 20967305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix Versus Connective Tissue Graft: Case Series of Various Gingival Recession Treatments.
Chevalier G; Cherkaoui S; Kruk H; Bensaïd X; Danan M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2017; 37(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 27977826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus free gingival graft: a histological evaluation and split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
de Resende DRB; Greghi SLA; Siqueira AF; Benfatti CAM; Damante CA; Ragghianti Zangrando MS
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 29713889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Coverage of previously carious roots is as predictable a procedure as coverage of intact roots.
Goldstein M; Nasatzky E; Goultschin J; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z
J Periodontol; 2002 Dec; 73(12):1419-26. PubMed ID: 12546091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
