1230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15975453)
1. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.
Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Toda I; Fujishima H; Arai H; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Hida Y; Yagi Y; Tsubota K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 15975453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early visual results with the rollable ThinOptX intraocular lens.
Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Fujishima H; Yagi Y; Tsubota K; Kojima T; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Yagi Y
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 15050249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses.
Hancox J; Spalton D; Heatley C; Jayaram H; Yip J; Boyce J; Marshall J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 17321391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses.
Claoué C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2088-91. PubMed ID: 15474819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens.
Heatley CJ; Spalton DJ; Hancox J; Kumar A; Marshall J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 15992754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.
Harman FE; Maling S; Kampougeris G; Langan L; Khan I; Lee N; Bloom PA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses.
Küchle M; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Gusek-Schneider GC; Martus P; Nguyen NX;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 15019382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
Ossma IL; Galvis A; Vargas LG; Trager MJ; Vagefi MR; McLeod SD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens in relation to capsulorhexis size.
Vargas LG; Auffarth GU; Becker KA; Rabsilber TM; Holzer MP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Feb; 31(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 15767160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept.
Alió JL; Ben-nun J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Plaza AB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 19781458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens.
Hancox J; Spalton D; Heatley C; Jayaram H; Marshall J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1098-103. PubMed ID: 16857494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens].
Wang J; Fu J; Wang NL; Kang HJ; Yang WL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 41(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 16191347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study.
Alió JL; Tavolato M; De la Hoz F; Claramonte P; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2494-503. PubMed ID: 15617915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses.
Vingolo EM; Grenga P; Iacobelli L; Grenga R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1244-7. PubMed ID: 17586381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biconvex posterior chamber accommodating intraocular lens implantation after cataract surgery: long-term outcomes.
Saiki M; Negishi K; Dogru M; Yamaguchi T; Tsubota K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 20362852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
Sanders DR; Sanders ML
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1679-84. PubMed ID: 17368545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longterm results of 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens implantation: 2-year follow-up study.
Mastropasqua L; Toto L; Falconio G; Nubile M; Carpineto P; Ciancaglini M; Di Nicola M; Ballone E
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Jun; 85(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 17403026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Posterior capsule opacification after implantation of a hydrophilic or a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: one-year follow-up.
Kugelberg M; Wejde G; Jayaram H; Zetterström C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1627-31. PubMed ID: 17010858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
