These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1597605)

  • 21. Older listeners' use of temporal cues altered by compression amplification.
    Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):661-74. PubMed ID: 10877436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contribution of a contralateral hearing aid to perception of consonant voicing, intonation, and emotional state in adult cochlear implantees.
    Most T; Gaon-Sivan G; Shpak T; Luntz M
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(2):244-58. PubMed ID: 22057984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Kluk K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1133-44. PubMed ID: 12243160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of reducing low-frequency amplification on consonant perception in quiet and noise.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 6521454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory pattern perception in the profoundly hearing impaired and lipreading of Dutch phonemes.
    van Son N; Bosman AJ; Lamoré PJ; Smoorenburg GF
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():111-23. PubMed ID: 8153557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory training in patients with unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral acoustic stimulation.
    Zhang T; Dorman MF; Fu QJ; Spahr AJ
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):e70-9. PubMed ID: 22622705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech perception abilities in children with cochlear implants or hearing aids.
    Somers MN
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():174-8. PubMed ID: 2069178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of spectral enhancement in hearing aids, combined with phonemic compression.
    Franck BA; van Kreveld-Bos CS; Dreschler WA; Verschuure H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Sep; 106(3 Pt 1):1452-64. PubMed ID: 10489703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory filtering and the discrimination of spectral shapes by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Turner CW; Holte LA; Relkin E
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 3430382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of intonation contours by normally hearing and profoundly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1172-8. PubMed ID: 3680776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of relative amplitude and formant transitions on perception of place of articulation by adult listeners with cochlear implants.
    Hedrick MS; Carney AE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1445-57. PubMed ID: 9430763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation].
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27670421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speechreading supplemented with auditorily presented speech elements in the profoundly hearing impaired.
    Bosman AJ; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1997; 36(1):29-45. PubMed ID: 9063559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Psychoacoustics of Profound Hearing Impairment.
    Rosen S; Faulkner A; Smith DAJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):16-22. PubMed ID: 31905503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of orthogonal polynomial compression.
    Levitt H; Neuman AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):241-52. PubMed ID: 1880295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.