BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1597610)

  • 1. Comparison of the acoustic properties of six popular stethoscopes.
    Abella M; Formolo J; Penney DG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2224-8. PubMed ID: 1597610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic characterization of stethoscopes using auscultation sounds as test signals.
    Nowak LJ; Nowak KM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1940. PubMed ID: 28372089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Heart sounds analysis via esophageal stethoscope system in beagles.
    Park SH; Shin YD; Bae JH; Kwon EJ; Lee TS; Shin JY; Kim YC; Min GD; Kim Mh
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2013 Oct; 27(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 23529343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency Responses of Conventional and Amplified Stethoscopes for Measuring Heart Sounds.
    Alanazi AA; Atcherson SR; Franklin CA; Bryan MF
    Saudi J Med Med Sci; 2020; 8(2):112-117. PubMed ID: 32587492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transmission of lung sounds through light clothing.
    Kraman SS
    Respiration; 2008; 75(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17202806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of auscultation findings using a classic stethoscope (Litmann 2120) and electronically amplified stethoscope (Medmax2)].
    Lukin A; Polić S; Rumboldt Z; Bagatin J; Rakić D; Kuzmanić A
    Lijec Vjesn; 1996; 118(5-6):127-8. PubMed ID: 8965622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental validation of the tuneable diaphragm effect in modern acoustic stethoscopes.
    Nowak KM; Nowak LJ
    Postgrad Med J; 2017 Sep; 93(1103):523-527. PubMed ID: 28289149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stethoscope acoustics and cervical auscultation of swallowing.
    Hamlet S; Penney DG; Formolo J
    Dysphagia; 1994; 9(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 8131427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9.
    Kalinauskienė E; Razvadauskas H; Morse DJ; Maxey GE; Naudžiūnas A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 30959832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Sound frequency analysis for identification of venous air embolism].
    Auer T; Ennemoser O; Ambach W; Huber C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1994 Mar; 39(3):47-50. PubMed ID: 8193245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a Smartphone App for Visualizing Heart Sounds and Murmurs.
    Mamorita N; Arisaka N; Isonaka R; Kawakami T; Takeuchi A
    Cardiology; 2017; 137(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 28441656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of the 3M Littmann Electronic Stethoscope Model 3200 in 150 cats.
    Blass KA; Schober KE; Bonagura JD; Scansen BA; Visser LC; Lu J; Smith DN; Ward JL
    J Feline Med Surg; 2013 Oct; 15(10):893-900. PubMed ID: 23599254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic Stethoscope Filtering Mimics the Perceived Sound Characteristics of Acoustic Stethoscope.
    Rennoll V; McLane I; Emmanouilidou D; West J; Elhilali M
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 May; 25(5):1542-1549. PubMed ID: 32870803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A visual stethoscope to detect the position of the tracheal tube.
    Kato H; Suzuki A; Nakajima Y; Makino H; Sanjo Y; Nakai T; Shiraishi Y; Katoh T; Sato S
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Dec; 109(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 19923511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Measurement of the frequency response of several stethoscopes in common use. Consequences for cardiac and pulmonary auscultation].
    Charbonneau G; Sudraud M
    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir; 1985; 21(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3978290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of abdominal auscultation for bowel obstruction.
    Breum BM; Rud B; Kirkegaard T; Nordentoft T
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 21(34):10018-24. PubMed ID: 26379407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of digital stethoscope for telemedicine.
    Lakhe A; Sodhi I; Warrier J; Sinha V
    J Med Eng Technol; 2016; 40(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 26728637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brief report: pulmonary auscultation in the operating room: a prospective randomized blinded trial comparing electronic and conventional stethoscopes.
    Hoffmann C; Falzone E; Verret C; Pasquier P; Leclerc T; Donat N; Jost D; Mérat S; Maurice GS; Lenoir B; Auroy Y; Tourtier JP
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Sep; 117(3):646-648. PubMed ID: 23868885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound differences between electronic and acoustic stethoscopes.
    Nowak LJ; Nowak KM
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Aug; 17(1):104. PubMed ID: 30075781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In flight auscultation: comparison of electronic and conventional stethoscopes.
    Tourtier JP; Fontaine E; Coste S; Ramsang S; Schiano P; Viaggi M; Libert N; Durand X; Chargari C; Borne M
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 29(8):932-5. PubMed ID: 20674225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.