These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1597610)

  • 1. Comparison of the acoustic properties of six popular stethoscopes.
    Abella M; Formolo J; Penney DG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2224-8. PubMed ID: 1597610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic characterization of stethoscopes using auscultation sounds as test signals.
    Nowak LJ; Nowak KM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1940. PubMed ID: 28372089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Heart sounds analysis via esophageal stethoscope system in beagles.
    Park SH; Shin YD; Bae JH; Kwon EJ; Lee TS; Shin JY; Kim YC; Min GD; Kim Mh
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2013 Oct; 27(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 23529343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency Responses of Conventional and Amplified Stethoscopes for Measuring Heart Sounds.
    Alanazi AA; Atcherson SR; Franklin CA; Bryan MF
    Saudi J Med Med Sci; 2020; 8(2):112-117. PubMed ID: 32587492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transmission of lung sounds through light clothing.
    Kraman SS
    Respiration; 2008; 75(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17202806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of auscultation findings using a classic stethoscope (Litmann 2120) and electronically amplified stethoscope (Medmax2)].
    Lukin A; Polić S; Rumboldt Z; Bagatin J; Rakić D; Kuzmanić A
    Lijec Vjesn; 1996; 118(5-6):127-8. PubMed ID: 8965622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental validation of the tuneable diaphragm effect in modern acoustic stethoscopes.
    Nowak KM; Nowak LJ
    Postgrad Med J; 2017 Sep; 93(1103):523-527. PubMed ID: 28289149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stethoscope acoustics and cervical auscultation of swallowing.
    Hamlet S; Penney DG; Formolo J
    Dysphagia; 1994; 9(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 8131427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9.
    Kalinauskienė E; Razvadauskas H; Morse DJ; Maxey GE; Naudžiūnas A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 30959832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Sound frequency analysis for identification of venous air embolism].
    Auer T; Ennemoser O; Ambach W; Huber C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1994 Mar; 39(3):47-50. PubMed ID: 8193245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a Smartphone App for Visualizing Heart Sounds and Murmurs.
    Mamorita N; Arisaka N; Isonaka R; Kawakami T; Takeuchi A
    Cardiology; 2017; 137(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 28441656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electronic Stethoscope Filtering Mimics the Perceived Sound Characteristics of Acoustic Stethoscope.
    Rennoll V; McLane I; Emmanouilidou D; West J; Elhilali M
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 May; 25(5):1542-1549. PubMed ID: 32870803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A visual stethoscope to detect the position of the tracheal tube.
    Kato H; Suzuki A; Nakajima Y; Makino H; Sanjo Y; Nakai T; Shiraishi Y; Katoh T; Sato S
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Dec; 109(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 19923511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Measurement of the frequency response of several stethoscopes in common use. Consequences for cardiac and pulmonary auscultation].
    Charbonneau G; Sudraud M
    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir; 1985; 21(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3978290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of the 3M Littmann Electronic Stethoscope Model 3200 in 150 cats.
    Blass KA; Schober KE; Bonagura JD; Scansen BA; Visser LC; Lu J; Smith DN; Ward JL
    J Feline Med Surg; 2013 Oct; 15(10):893-900. PubMed ID: 23599254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of abdominal auscultation for bowel obstruction.
    Breum BM; Rud B; Kirkegaard T; Nordentoft T
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 21(34):10018-24. PubMed ID: 26379407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of digital stethoscope for telemedicine.
    Lakhe A; Sodhi I; Warrier J; Sinha V
    J Med Eng Technol; 2016; 40(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 26728637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brief report: pulmonary auscultation in the operating room: a prospective randomized blinded trial comparing electronic and conventional stethoscopes.
    Hoffmann C; Falzone E; Verret C; Pasquier P; Leclerc T; Donat N; Jost D; Mérat S; Maurice GS; Lenoir B; Auroy Y; Tourtier JP
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Sep; 117(3):646-648. PubMed ID: 23868885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound differences between electronic and acoustic stethoscopes.
    Nowak LJ; Nowak KM
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Aug; 17(1):104. PubMed ID: 30075781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In flight auscultation: comparison of electronic and conventional stethoscopes.
    Tourtier JP; Fontaine E; Coste S; Ramsang S; Schiano P; Viaggi M; Libert N; Durand X; Chargari C; Borne M
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 29(8):932-5. PubMed ID: 20674225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.