These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15976203)

  • 1. Moral permissibility as a guide for decision making about conjoined twins.
    Waisel DB
    Anesth Analg; 2005 Jul; 101(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15976203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The conjoined twins. Transcript of the speeches given at the BAFS annual dinner on 28 February 2002. British Academy of Forensic Sciences.
    Spitz L
    Med Sci Law; 2002 Oct; 42(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 12545995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The conjoined twins Mary and Jodie: ethical analysis of their case.
    Murphy-O'Connor C
    Origins; 2000 Oct; 30(17):269-72. PubMed ID: 12557888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Jodie and Mary, conjoined twins: a case of judicial moral hubris?
    Gillon R
    Med Leg J; 2004; 72(Pt 1):3-16. PubMed ID: 15038316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heart and soul: the case of the conjoined twins.
    Sulmasy DP
    America (NY); 2000 Dec; 183(18):12-4. PubMed ID: 11769757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The case of the British conjoined twins.
    Bleich JD
    Tradition; 2000; 34(4):61-78. PubMed ID: 14696602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conjoined twins: the limits of reason and the transcendent hope--part two.
    Phang A
    Law Justice; 2001; (147):89-113. PubMed ID: 12715812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conjoined twins: can the state mandate sacrifice surgery?
    Stewart LM
    Howard Law J; 2002; 45(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 15156890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Killing Mary to save Jodie: conjoined twins and individual rights.
    Wasserman D
    Philos Public Policy Q; 2001; 21(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 12705248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Separating conjoined twins: a medical and criminal law dilemma.
    Davis C
    J Law Med; 2010 Feb; 17(4):594-607. PubMed ID: 20329459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Maltese conjoined twins.
    Gormally L
    Second Opin (Chic); 2001 Oct; (8):36-52. PubMed ID: 16025644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conjoined twins : the limits of reason and the transcendent hope--part one.
    Phang A
    Law Justice; 2001; (146):38-56. PubMed ID: 12962087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On file.
    Origins; 2000 Oct; 30(17):258. PubMed ID: 12557887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separation of the conjoined twins: a comparative analysis of the rights to privacy and religious freedom in Great Britain and the United States.
    Tomasso JB
    Rutgers Law Rev; 2002; 54(3):771-801. PubMed ID: 15233129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conjoined twins: the ethics of separation.
    Faulkner J
    RCM Midwives; 2006 Mar; 9(3):86-7. PubMed ID: 16583854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The legacy of Ladan and Laleh.
    Thompson RE
    Physician Exec; 2003; 29(5):52-4. PubMed ID: 14531187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The spectre of court-sanctioned sacrificial separation of teenage conjoined twins against their will.
    Davis C
    J Law Med; 2014 Jun; 21(4):973-83. PubMed ID: 25087373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The conjoined twins of Malta: direct or indirect killing?
    Guevin B
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 12866526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation).
    Great Britain. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 2000; 4():961-1070. PubMed ID: 15069933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human beings, persons and conjoined twins: an ethical analysis of the judgement in Re A.
    Harris J
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):221-36. PubMed ID: 14696614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.