BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15976337)

  • 1. HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques.
    Ellis CM; Dyson MJ; Stephenson TJ; Maltby EL
    J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):710-4. PubMed ID: 15976337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amplification of the HER2 gene in breast cancers testing 2+ weak positive by HercepTest immunohistochemistry: false-positive or false-negative immunohistochemistry?
    Barrett C; Magee H; O'Toole D; Daly S; Jeffers M
    J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 60(6):690-3. PubMed ID: 16822876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IHC for Her2 with CBE356 antibody is a more accurate predictor of Her2 gene amplification by FISH than HercepTest in breast carcinoma.
    Ainsworth R; Bartlett JM; Going JJ; Mallon EA; Forsyth A; Richmond J; Angerson W; Watters A; Dunne B
    J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):1086-90. PubMed ID: 16189156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing subjective and digital image analysis HER2/neu expression scores with conventional and modified FISH scores in breast cancer.
    Skaland I; Øvestad I; Janssen EA; Klos J; Kjellevold KH; Helliesen T; Baak JP
    J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 17412872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous detection of HER2/neu gene amplification and protein overexpression in paraffin-embedded breast cancer.
    Lottner C; Schwarz S; Diermeier S; Hartmann A; Knuechel R; Hofstaedter F; Brockhoff G
    J Pathol; 2005 Apr; 205(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 15732132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HER2-testing in 538 consecutive breast cancer cases using FISH and immunohistochemistry.
    Kovács A; Stenman G
    Pathol Res Pract; 2010 Jan; 206(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 19819642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer HER2 equivocal cases: is there an alternative to FISH testing? A pilot study using two different antibodies sequentially.
    Yosepovich A; Avivi C; Bar J; Polak-Charcon S; Mardoukh C; Barshack I
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Jun; 12(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 20928989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of automated and manual determination of HER2 status in breast cancer for diagnostic use: a comparative methodological study using the Ventana BenchMark automated staining system and manual tests.
    Bánkfalvi A; Boecker W; Reiner A
    Int J Oncol; 2004 Oct; 25(4):929-35. PubMed ID: 15375542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment for HER-2/neu status in Taiwanese breast cancer patients.
    Kuo SJ; Wang BB; Chang CS; Chen TH; Yeh KT; Lee DJ; Yin PL; Chen M
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 46(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 17638622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study.
    Hofmann M; Stoss O; Shi D; Büttner R; van de Vijver M; Kim W; Ochiai A; Rüschoff J; Henkel T
    Histopathology; 2008 Jun; 52(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 18422971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of HER2 status in breast carcinoma by fully automated HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): comparison of two immunohistochemical tests and manual FISH.
    Yoon N; Do IG; Cho EY
    APMIS; 2014 Sep; 122(9):755-60. PubMed ID: 24372629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HER2 status in breast cancer determined by IHC and FISH: comparison of the results.
    Mrozkowiak A; Olszewski WP; Piaścik A; Olszewski WT
    Pol J Pathol; 2004; 55(4):165-71. PubMed ID: 15757204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HER-2 status in breast cancer: correlation of gene amplification by FISH with immunohistochemistry expression using advanced cellular imaging system.
    Ciampa A; Xu B; Ayata G; Baiyee D; Wallace J; Wertheimer M; Edmiston K; Khan A
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2006 Jun; 14(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 16785779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization-based comparison between the Oracle HER2 Bond Immunohistochemical System, Dako HercepTest, and Vysis PathVysion HER2 FISH using both commercially validated and modified ASCO/CAP and United Kingdom HER2 IHC scoring guidelines.
    O'Grady A; Allen D; Happerfield L; Johnson N; Provenzano E; Pinder SE; Tee L; Gu M; Kay EW
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2010 Dec; 18(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 20661132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation and workflow optimization of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing using INFORM HER2 dual-color in situ hybridization.
    Lim SJ; Cantillep A; Carpenter PM
    Hum Pathol; 2013 Nov; 44(11):2590-6. PubMed ID: 24075600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastroesophageal cancer: correlation between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Tafe LJ; Janjigian YY; Zaidinski M; Hedvat CV; Hameed MR; Tang LH; Hicks JB; Shah MA; Barbashina V
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1460-5. PubMed ID: 22032573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated cellular imaging system III for assessing HER2 status in breast cancer specimens: development of a standardized scoring method that correlates with FISH.
    Minot DM; Kipp BR; Root RM; Meyer RG; Reynolds CA; Nassar A; Henry MR; Clayton AC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Jul; 132(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 19864244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HER2 evaluation using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3 and CISH in tissue microarrays of invasive breast carcinomas.
    Ricardo SA; Milanezi F; Carvalho ST; Leitão DR; Schmitt FC
    J Clin Pathol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):1001-5. PubMed ID: 17158643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-time quantitative PCR of microdissected paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma: an alternative method for HER-2/neu analysis.
    Gjerdrum LM; Sorensen BS; Kjeldsen E; Sorensen FB; Nexo E; Hamilton-Dutoit S
    J Mol Diagn; 2004 Feb; 6(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 14736826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) to detect HER2 gene amplification in breast and gastric cancer: comparison with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
    Kiyose S; Igarashi H; Nagura K; Kamo T; Kawane K; Mori H; Ozawa T; Maeda M; Konno K; Hoshino H; Konno H; Ogura H; Shinmura K; Hattori N; Sugimura H
    Pathol Int; 2012 Nov; 62(11):728-34. PubMed ID: 23121603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.