These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15976587)

  • 1. Clinical performance of microchannel contact lenses.
    Weidemann KE; Lakkis C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 15976587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of lens conditioning on signs and symptoms with new hydrogel contact lenses.
    Coles ML; Brennan NA; Shuley V; Woods J; Prior C; Vehige JG; Simmons PA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2004 Nov; 87(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 15575809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule.
    Brennan NA; Coles ML; Comstock TL; Levy B
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1172-7. PubMed ID: 12045062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Efron N; Efron S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):536-48. PubMed ID: 15976592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical performance of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses.
    Varikooty J; Schulze MM; Dumbleton K; Keir N; Woods CA; Fonn D; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 25628269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crossover Evaluation of Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
    Wolffsohn JS; Mroczkowska S; Hunt OA; Bilkhu P; Drew T; Sheppard A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1063-8. PubMed ID: 26390350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Daily versus monthly disposable contact lens: Which is better for ocular surface physiology and comfort?
    Sapkota K; Franco S; Lira M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Jun; 41(3):252-257. PubMed ID: 29221708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical investigation of asmofilcon a silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Lakkis C; Vincent S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 86(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 19258913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative clinical performance of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses for continuous wear.
    Morgan PB; Efron N
    Clin Exp Optom; 2002 May; 85(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 12033981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers.
    Dillehay SM; Miller MB
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):272-7. PubMed ID: 17993820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel.
    Cheung SW; Cho P; Chan B; Choy C; Ng V
    Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Mar; 90(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 17311574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of long-term users of two contact lens care preservative systems.
    Young G; Keir N; Hunt C; Woods CA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Mar; 35(2):50-8. PubMed ID: 19265324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Short Recovery Periods on Ocular Comfort During Daily Lens Wear.
    Stahl U; Keir NJ; Landers A; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):861-71. PubMed ID: 27362613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers.
    Best N; Drury L; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):232-7. PubMed ID: 23522993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Dumbleton K; Keir N; Moezzi A; Feng Y; Jones L; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparative clinical performance of a new polyhexamethylene biguanide- vs a polyquad-based contact lens care regime with two silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Mar; 27(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 17324206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the performance of 6- or 30-night extended wear schedules with silicone hydrogel lenses over 3 years.
    Stern J; Wong R; Naduvilath TJ; Stretton S; Holden BA; Sweeney DF
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jun; 81(6):398-406. PubMed ID: 15201712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses.
    Walker J; Young G; Hunt C; Henderson T
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 17395523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring non-adherence to contact lens wear schedule: Subjective assessments and patient related factors in children wearing single vision and myopia control contact lenses.
    Weng R; Naduvilath T; Philip K; Chen X; Sankaridurg P
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2021 Feb; 44(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 33288408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time.
    Garofalo RJ; Dassanayake N; Carey C; Stein J; Stone R; David R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2005 Jul; 31(4):166-74. PubMed ID: 16021004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.