These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15977327)
1. Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093. Wilde ML William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):351-412. PubMed ID: 15977327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision. Kendall CC John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral. Hirt TC Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994. Merz JF; Jackson CA; Klerman JA Womens Rights Law Report; 1995; 17(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11863033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Joersz M N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion rights after South Dakota. McDonagh E Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice. Berg P Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion and the law in 1980. Paul EW; Schaap P NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Big abortion: what the antiabortion movement can learn from big tobacco. Heminger JD Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2005; 54(4):1273-311. PubMed ID: 17115504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The denial of abortion care information, referrals, and services undermines quality care for U.S. women. Weitz TA; Fogel SB Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20123171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart. Borgmann CE Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The unborn and the born again. New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute. Gough AD Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions. Zenkich S Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment. Graines S; Wyatt J Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.". Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care. Bertuglia J Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent and abortion. Kapp MB Wis L Rev; 1993; 1993(2):619-23. PubMed ID: 11659680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]