319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15977329)
1. An unjust act: the schizophrenic state of maturity and culpability in juvenile justice and minor abortion rights law; recent trends in Virginia and nationally.
Foxworth JM
William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):495-533. PubMed ID: 15977329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy.
Storrow RF; Martinez S
Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution.
Hayhurst MB
Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
Scuder AC
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
Bertuglia J
Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
Ehrlich JS
Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States.
Belling DW; Eberl C
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
Bertz RC
West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
Ehrlich JS
Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Family law I: abortion.
Koscs ME
Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
Ehrlich JS
Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth.
Siegel DM
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 21683911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services.
Blasdell J
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
O'Shaughnessy M
Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II.
Graziano SG
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994.
Merz JF; Jackson CA; Klerman JA
Womens Rights Law Report; 1995; 17(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11863033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion: Supreme Court avoids disturbing abortion precedents by ruling on grounds of Remedy-Ayotte v. planned parenthood of Northern New England.
Law N
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):469-71. PubMed ID: 16789971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court to tackle abortion again after 5 years; parent notification case; in considering technical issues, justices rejoin a fractious debate.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 May; ():A1, A17. PubMed ID: 15948341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
Bonnie RJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 15515919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors.
Herbert PB; Meyers JR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 15704630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
