BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

847 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15978273)

  • 1. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures.
    Turssi CP; Ferracane JL; Serra MC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jul; 21(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 15978273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Voit S; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12540119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
    Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols.
    Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites.
    Reis AF; Giannini M; Lovadino JR; dos Santos Dias CT
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12469758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11931137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 9484147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finishing tooth-colored restorations in vitro: an index of surface alteration and finish-line destruction.
    Schmidlin PR; Göhring TN
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 14753337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface roughness of glass-ceramic insert-composite restorations: assessing several polishing techniques.
    Ashe MJ; Tripp GA; Eichmiller FC; George LA; Meiers JC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Oct; 127(10):1495-500. PubMed ID: 8908919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.