These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

851 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15978273)

  • 21. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations.
    Maresca C; Pimenta LA; Heymann HO; Ziemiecki TL; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 20433561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Postadjustment polishing of CAD-CAM ceramic with luminescence diamond gel.
    Finger WJ; Noack MD
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 11763906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surface roughness of resin composite prepared by single-use and multi-use diamonds.
    Roeder LB; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15151337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.
    Da Costa J; Ferracane J; Paravina RD; Mazur RF; Roeder L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. PubMed ID: 17635330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite enamel and composite dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part I: roughness after treatments with tungsten carbide vs diamond burs.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):70-89. PubMed ID: 24757700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins.
    Kuhar M; Funduk N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15624002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium.
    Reddy ES; Patil NP; Guttal SS; Jagadish HG
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 17451480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against natural enamel after different finishing procedures.
    Mitov G; Heintze SD; Walz S; Woll K; Muecklich F; Pospiech P
    Dent Mater; 2012 Aug; 28(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 22608163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of diamond-impregnated felt wheels for polishing a hybrid composite.
    Jung M; Baumstieger M; Klimek J
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Jun; 1(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9552821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.
    Ahmad R; Morgano SM; Wu BM; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites.
    Marghalani HY
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 20433565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing systems.
    Yap AU; Tan WS; Yeo JC; Yap WY; Ong SB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 12120776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
    Daud A; Gray G; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A proposed clinical method for the finishing of composite-resin restorations by means of diamond burs and abrasive disks and strips: a SEM analysis].
    D'Arcangelo C; Delle Fratte T
    Minerva Stomatol; 1996 Apr; 45(4):135-40. PubMed ID: 8926980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface roughness of enamel and four resin composites.
    Botta AC; Duarte S; Paulin Filho PI; Gheno SM; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2009 Oct; 22(5):252-4. PubMed ID: 20225464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.