These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15978305)

  • 1. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Greiner JV; Udell IJ
    Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Mah FS; Rosenwasser LJ; Townsend WD; Greiner JV; Bensch G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jun; 23(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17559743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time to onset and duration of action of the antihistamine bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solutions 1.0% and 1.5% in allergic conjunctivitis: a phase III, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge assessment in adults and children.
    Abelson MB; Torkildsen GL; Williams JI; Gow JA; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR;
    Clin Ther; 2009 Sep; 31(9):1908-21. PubMed ID: 19843481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the relative efficacy and clinical performance of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival antigen challenge model.
    Berdy GJ; Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy SS; Brusatti RC
    Clin Ther; 2000 Jul; 22(7):826-33. PubMed ID: 10945509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Greiner JV
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
    Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the effects of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% and olopatadine HCl 0.1% ophthalmic solutions in seasonal allergic conjunctivities: a 30-day, randomized, double-masked, artificial tear substitute-controlled trial.
    Avunduk AM; Tekelioglu Y; Turk A; Akyol N
    Clin Ther; 2005 Sep; 27(9):1392-402. PubMed ID: 16291412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of olopatadine, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity, using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1998 Sep; 81(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 9759796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
    Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prolonged effectiveness of bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
    Williams JI; Kennedy KS; Gow JA; Torkildsen GL; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR;
    J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Aug; 27(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 21649522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine versus ketotifen ophthalmic solutions: a double-masked, environmental study of patient preference.
    Leonardi A; Zafirakis P
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1167-73. PubMed ID: 15324519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
    Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
    Brodsky M; Berger WE; Butrus S; Epstein AB; Irkec M
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12695716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and response with olopatadine versus epinastine in ocular allergic symptoms: a post hoc analysis of data from a conjunctival allergen challenge study.
    Finegold I; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Epstein AB
    Clin Ther; 2006 Oct; 28(10):1630-8. PubMed ID: 17157118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution versus fluticasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
    Rosenwasser LJ; Mahr T; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Kennedy K
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2008; 29(6):644-53. PubMed ID: 19063816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
    Crampton HJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1975-87. PubMed ID: 12946545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of olopatadine HCI 0.1%, ketotifen fumarate 0.025%, epinastine HCI 0.05%, emedastine 0.05% and fluorometholone acetate 0.1% ophthalmic solutions for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a placebo-controlled environmental trial.
    Borazan M; Karalezli A; Akova YA; Akman A; Kiyici H; Erbek SS
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 87(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 18631332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of once-daily olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution compared to twice-daily olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular itching induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Abelson MB; Spangler DL; Epstein AB; Mah FS; Crampton HJ
    Curr Eye Res; 2007 Dec; 32(12):1017-22. PubMed ID: 18085465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of olopatadine ophthalmic solution 0.2% in reducing signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
    Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Pasquine T; Edwards MR; Gross RD; Robertson SM
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17883910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.