These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15978337)

  • 1. Relatedness and DNA: are we taking it seriously enough?
    Buckleton J; Triggs CM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):115-9. PubMed ID: 15978337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Match probabilities for multiple siblings.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jul; 6(4):466-8. PubMed ID: 22088773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Match probabilities for Y-chromosomal profiles: A paradigm shift.
    Caliebe A; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():200-203. PubMed ID: 30216912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Problems of assessing sibship probabilities by means of genetic analysis].
    Mályusz V; Poetsch M; Simeoni E; Schwark T; Manfred O; von Wurmb-Schwark N
    Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 16948260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of linkage on the calculation of DNA match probabilities for siblings and half siblings.
    Buckleton J; Triggs C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jul; 160(2-3):193-9. PubMed ID: 16293384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Full siblings impersonating parent/child prove most difficult to discredit with DNA profiling alone.
    Fung WK; Wong DM; Hu YQ
    Transfusion; 2004 Oct; 44(10):1513-5. PubMed ID: 15383026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination of half-siblings when maternal genotypes are known.
    Mayor LR; Balding DJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 159(2-3):141-7. PubMed ID: 16153794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legal standards and the significance of DNA evidence.
    Gomulkiewicz R; Slade NA
    Hum Biol; 1997 Oct; 69(5):675-88. PubMed ID: 9299887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implication of population structure in the resolution of cattle stealing cases.
    Lirón JP; Ripoli MV; Peral-García P; Giovambattista G
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Sep; 52(5):1077-81. PubMed ID: 17680792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of sibship determination by using 15 STR loci.
    Pu CE; Linacre A
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2008 Jul; 15(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 18511010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the statistical power of DNA-based identification, exemplified by 'The missing grandchildren of Argentina'.
    Kling D; Egeland T; Piñero MH; Vigeland MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():57-66. PubMed ID: 28858673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of relatives on the likelihood ratio associated with DNA profile evidence in criminal cases.
    Brookfield JF
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1994; 34(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 7931134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How reliable is the sub-population model in DNA testimony?
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Walsh SJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):144-8. PubMed ID: 15921869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of sibling pairs to determine the familial searching efficiency of forensic databases.
    Reid TM; Baird ML; Reid JP; Lee SC; Lee RF
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 19083845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpreting DNA mixtures with the presence of relatives.
    Hu YQ; Fung WK
    Int J Legal Med; 2003 Feb; 117(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 12592594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonindependence of matches at different loci in DNA profiles: quantifying the effect of close relatives on the match probability.
    Donnelly P
    Heredity (Edinb); 1995 Jul; 75 ( Pt 1)():26-34. PubMed ID: 7649755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population genetics of coincidental DNA matches.
    Li CC
    Hum Biol; 1996 Apr; 68(2):167-84. PubMed ID: 8838910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The clinical relationship between symptoms and the final diagnosis in general practice, determined by means of posterior probabilities calculated on the basis of the Transition Project].
    Lamberts H; Oskam SK; Okkes IM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Nov; 149(46):2566-72. PubMed ID: 16320668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of forensic findings when alternative explanations have different likelihoods-"Blame-the-brother"-syndrome.
    Nordgaard A; Hedell R; Ansell R
    Sci Justice; 2012 Dec; 52(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 23068773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Empirical support for the reliability of DNA interpretation in Croatia.
    Lauc G; Dzijan S; Marjanovic D; Walsh S; Curran J; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Dec; 3(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 19083868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.