These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15978647)

  • 1. Seasonal tertiary wastewater treatment in California: an analysis of public health benefits and costs.
    Olivieri AW; Soller JA; Olivieri KJ; Goebel RP; Tchobanoglous G
    Water Res; 2005 Aug; 39(13):3035-43. PubMed ID: 15978647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fecal coliform accumulation within a river subject to seasonally-disinfected wastewater discharges.
    Mitch AA; Gasner KC; Mitch WA
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4776-82. PubMed ID: 20580053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating susceptible subpopulations in microbial risk assessment: pediatric exposures to enteroviruses in river water.
    Parkin RT; Soller JA; Olivieri AW
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 Mar; 13(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 12679796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Project CARE: reducing wet weather overflows to improve beach water quality. Council Action in Respect of the Environment.
    Heijs J; Wilkinson D; Couriel E
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):35-46. PubMed ID: 12380972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simplified risk-based approach for process screening in municipal wastewater reclamation and reuse.
    Chu WH; Wang JY; Kao CM
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(1):257-62. PubMed ID: 12578203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost-benefit analysis.
    Molinos-Senante M; Hernández-Sancho F; Sala-Garrido R
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4396-402. PubMed ID: 20667582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Realisation of the EU Directive 91/271/EWG in Germany technical and economic effects from the perspective of an operator of large wastewater treatment plants.
    Obenaus F; Kraft A
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):257-63. PubMed ID: 15553484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative analysis: storm water pollution policy in California, USA and Victoria, Australia.
    Swamikannu X; Radulescu D; Young R; Allison R
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):311-7. PubMed ID: 12793695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-benefit evaluation of a decentralized water system for wastewater reuse and environmental protection.
    Chen R; Wang XC
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(8):1515-22. PubMed ID: 19403964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Centralised versus decentralised treatment and disposal options for Küçükçekmece Basin of Istanbul city.
    Eroğlu V; Sarikaya HZ; Yüksel E; Koyuncu I
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):371-8. PubMed ID: 12381014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A public health evaluation of recreational water impairment.
    Soller JA; Eisenberg JN; DeGeorge JF; Cooper RC; Tchobanoglous G; Olivieri AW
    J Water Health; 2006 Mar; 4(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 16604834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Setting up microbiological water reuse guidelines for the Mediterranean.
    Bahri A; Brissaud F
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(2):39-46. PubMed ID: 15344771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic considerations for wastewater upgrading alternatives: an Israeli test case.
    Fine P; Halperin R; Hadas E
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Jan; 78(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 16115725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Field observations and management strategy for hot spring wastewater in Wulai area, Taiwan.
    Lin JY; Chen CF; Lei FR; Hsieh CD
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2309-16. PubMed ID: 20418628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recirculating gravel filters: high-performance treatment at low cost for two small communities.
    Newton C; Wilson JP
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(6):1245-51. PubMed ID: 18845863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential societal and economic impacts of wastewater nutrient removal and recycling.
    Randall CW
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 12926616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of anaerobic treatment alternatives for brandy distillery process water.
    Chrobak R; Ryder R
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 15771114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nitrogen and phosphorus leaching from growing season versus year-round application of wastewater on seasonally frozen lands.
    Zvomuya F; Rosen CJ; Gupta SC
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(1):324-33. PubMed ID: 16397108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of airborne microorganism contamination in an industrial area characterized by an open composting facility and a wastewater treatment plant.
    Grisoli P; Rodolfi M; Villani S; Grignani E; Cottica D; Berri A; Picco AM; Dacarro C
    Environ Res; 2009 Feb; 109(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19131053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk-based approach to evaluate the public health benefit of additional wastewater treatment.
    Soller JA; Olivieri AW; Crook J; Cooper RC; Tchobanoglous G; Parkin RT; Spear RC; Eisenberg JN
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 May; 37(9):1882-91. PubMed ID: 12775061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.