These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15978707)

  • 1. Sources of uncertainty in model predictions: lessons learned from the IAEA Forest and Fruit Working Group model intercomparisons.
    Linkov I; Burmistrov D
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 15978707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model uncertainty and choices made by modelers: lessons learned from the International Atomic Energy Agency model intercomparisons.
    Linkov I; Burmistrov D
    Risk Anal; 2003 Dec; 23(6):1297-308. PubMed ID: 14641902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radionuclides in fruit systems: model-model intercomparison study.
    Linkov I; Carini F; Collins C; Eged K; Mitchell NG; Mourlon C; Ould-Dada Z; Robles B; Sweeck L; Venter A
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 364(1-3):124-37. PubMed ID: 16157363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model and input uncertainty in multi-media fate modeling: benzo[a]pyrene concentrations in Europe.
    Hauck M; Huijbregts MA; Armitage JM; Cousins IT; Ragas AM; van de Meent D
    Chemosphere; 2008 Jun; 72(6):959-67. PubMed ID: 18440046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian methodology for model uncertainty using model performance data.
    Droguett EL; Mosleh A
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1457-76. PubMed ID: 18793282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Good modeling practice for PAT applications: propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis.
    Sin G; Gernaey KV; Lantz AE
    Biotechnol Prog; 2009; 25(4):1043-53. PubMed ID: 19569187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model averaging techniques for quantifying conceptual model uncertainty.
    Singh A; Mishra S; Ruskauff G
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):701-15. PubMed ID: 19878329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radionuclide migration in forest ecosystems--results of a model validation study.
    Shaw G; Venter A; Avila R; Bergman R; Bulgakov A; Calmon P; Fesenko S; Frissel M; Goor F; Konoplev A; Linkov I; Mamikhin S; Moberg L; Orlov A; Rantavaara A; Spiridonov S; Thiry Y
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 15970363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modelling.
    Dubus IG; Brown CD; Beulke S
    Sci Total Environ; 2003 Dec; 317(1-3):53-72. PubMed ID: 14630412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calibrating and validating bacterial water quality models: a Bayesian approach.
    Gronewold AD; Qian SS; Wolpert RL; Reckhow KH
    Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(10):2688-98. PubMed ID: 19395060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model-averaging method for assessing groundwater conceptual model uncertainty.
    Ye M; Pohlmann KF; Chapman JB; Pohll GM; Reeves DM
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):716-28. PubMed ID: 19788638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling and experimental studies on the transfer of radionuclides to fruit.
    Carini F; Atkinson CJ; Collins C; Coughtrey PJ; Eged K; Fulker M; Green N; Kinnersley R; Linkov I; Mitchell NG; Mourlon C; Ould-Dada Z; Quinault JM; Robles B; Stewart A; Sweeck L; Venter A
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):271-84. PubMed ID: 15963608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model comparison for risk assessment: a case study of contaminated groundwater.
    Chen YC; Ma HW
    Chemosphere; 2006 May; 63(5):751-61. PubMed ID: 16213568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model uncertainty--parameter uncertainty versus conceptual models.
    Højberg AL; Refsgaard JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):177-86. PubMed ID: 16304950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Model testing for the remediation assessment of a radium contaminated site in Olen, Belgium.
    Sweeck L; Kanyár B; Krajewski P; Kryshev A; Lietava P; Nenyei A; Sazykina T; Yu C; Zeevaert T
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 15978706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of a decision analytic model for posteradication polio risk management.
    Duintjer Tebbens RJ; Pallansch MA; Kew OM; Sutter RW; Bruce Aylward R; Watkins M; Gary H; Alexander J; Jafari H; Cochi SL; Thompson KM
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):855-76. PubMed ID: 18627544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experiences with the NUSAP system for multidimensional uncertainty assessment.
    van der Sluijs J; Craye M; Funtowicz S; Kloprogge P; Ravetz J; Risbey J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):133-44. PubMed ID: 16304945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using semivariogram parameter uncertainty in hydrogeological applications.
    Pardo-Igúzquiza E; Chica-Olmo M; Garcia-Soldado MJ; Luque-Espinar JA
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 18793202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model testing using data on 131I released from Hanford.
    Thiessen KM; Napier BA; Filistovic V; Homma T; Kanyár B; Krajewski P; Kryshev AI; Nedveckaite T; Nényei A; Sazykina TG; Tveten U; Sjöblom KL; Robinson C
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 15975695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.