BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15978765)

  • 1. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
    Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT].
    Coppenrath E; Draenert F; Lechel U; Veit R; Meindl T; Reiser M; Mueller-Lisse U
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 18543414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chau AC; Fung K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
    Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thyroid shields for radiation dose reduction during cone beam computed tomography scanning for different oral and maxillofacial regions.
    Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e376-80. PubMed ID: 22209523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of thyroid gland shielding in dental CBCT using a paediatric anthropomorphic phantom.
    Hidalgo A; Davies J; Horner K; Theodorakou C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140285. PubMed ID: 25411710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
    Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
    Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology.
    Ludlow JB; Ivanovic M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 18504152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation dose to the thyroid gland and breast from multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: does bismuth shielding with and without a cervical collar reduce dose?
    Gunn ML; Kanal KM; Kolokythas O; Anzai Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):987-90. PubMed ID: 19940673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ESTIMATION OF EFFECTIVE DOSE OF DENTAL X-RAY DEVICES.
    Qiang W; Qiang F; Lin L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):417-421. PubMed ID: 30169836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
    Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system.
    Cheng HC; Wu VW; Liu ES; Kwong DL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):291-300. PubMed ID: 20932676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography.
    Schulze D; Heiland M; Thurmann H; Adam G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 15313998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
    Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.