These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

946 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15978776)

  • 1. Bone quality at the implant site after reconstruction of a local defect of the maxillary anterior ridge with chin bone or deproteinised cancellous bovine bone.
    Meijndert L; Raghoebar GM; Schüpbach P; Meijer HJ; Vissink A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 34(8):877-84. PubMed ID: 15978776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases.
    Hämmerle CH; Jung RE; Yaman D; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 17956571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation.
    Proussaefs P; Lozada J
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):237-47. PubMed ID: 17069168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement.
    Tawil G; Mawla M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alveolar ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss: a histologic study in humans.
    Zitzmann NU; Schärer P; Marinello CP; Schüpbach P; Berglundh T
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Jun; 21(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 11490406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ridge enlargement using deproteinized bovine bone and a bioresorbable collagen membrane: a tomodensitometric, histologic, and histomorphometric analysis.
    Ohayon L
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Jun; 31(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 21556380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio Oss).
    Simion M; Fontana F; Rasperini G; Maiorana C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):620-9. PubMed ID: 17877463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.
    Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study.
    Zitzmann NU; Schärer P; Marinello CP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 11432655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two resorbable membrane systems in bone regeneration after removal of wisdom teeth: a randomized-controlled clinical pilot study.
    Zwahlen RA; Cheung LK; Zheng LW; Chow RL; Li T; Schuknecht B; Grätz KW; Weber FE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1084-91. PubMed ID: 19751357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 1: histologic results.
    Fugazzotto PA
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Aug; 23(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 12956480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans.
    Yildirim M; Spiekermann H; Handt S; Edelhoff D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11280359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 2: Clinical results.
    Fugazzotto PA
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 14703764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute.
    Schlegel KA; Fichtner G; Schultze-Mosgau S; Wiltfang J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12608669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 22 patients.
    Urban IA; Nagursky H; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):404-14. PubMed ID: 21483894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histomorphometric analysis following augmentation of the anterior atrophic maxilla with cancellous bone block allograft.
    Nissan J; Marilena V; Gross O; Mardinger O; Chaushu G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 22299083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting.
    Froum SJ; Wallace SS; Elian N; Cho SC; Tarnow DP
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 17243327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced - augmented and non-augmented - defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog.
    Cardaropoli G; Araújo M; Hayacibara R; Sukekava F; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 15842256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.