387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15978824)
21. Growth-related shape changes in the fetal craniofacial complex of humans (Homo sapiens) and pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina): a 3D-CT comparative analysis.
Zumpano MP; Richtsmeier JT
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2003 Apr; 120(4):339-51. PubMed ID: 12627529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls.
Hägg U; Cooke MS; Chan TC; Tng TT; Lau PY
Aust Orthod J; 1998 Oct; 15(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10204427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method.
Olmez H; Gorgulu S; Akin E; Bengi AO; Tekdemir I; Ors F
Angle Orthod; 2011 May; 81(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 21261485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Swennen GR; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 19369033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A fully three-dimensional method for facial reconstruction based on deformable models.
Quatrehomme G; Cotin S; Subsol G; Delingette H; Garidel Y; Grévin G; Fidrich M; Bailet P; Ollier A
J Forensic Sci; 1997 Jul; 42(4):649-52. PubMed ID: 9243826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
Kusnoto B
Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 17692701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A new method of three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction from X-ray angiography: validation against a virtual phantom and multislice computed tomography.
Andriotis A; Zifan A; Gavaises M; Liatsis P; Pantos I; Theodorakakos A; Efstathopoulos EP; Katritsis D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 18098180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Certain anatomical relations and the precise morphometry of the infraorbital foramen--canal and groove: an anatomical and cephalometric study.
Kazkayasi M; Ergin A; Ersoy M; Bengi O; Tekdemir I; Elhan A
Laryngoscope; 2001 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):609-14. PubMed ID: 11359128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Quantitative 3D measurements of the skull base by using spiral volumatric CT images].
Zhang H; Bu R; Li Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Sep; 35(5):377-80. PubMed ID: 11780250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-dimensional facial morphometry and conventional cephalometrics: a correlation study.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Puleo A; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 9456609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging.
Baik HS; Lee HJ; Lee KJ
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16548301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. 3D CT-based cephalometric analysis: 3D cephalometric theoretical concept and software.
Olszewski R; Cosnard G; Macq B; Mahy P; Reychler H
Neuroradiology; 2006 Nov; 48(11):853-62. PubMed ID: 17009024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The accuracy of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance 3D vibe images of the mandible: an in vitro comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.
Goto TK; Nishida S; Nakamura Y; Tokumori K; Nakamura Y; Kobayashi K; Yoshida Y; Yoshiura K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Apr; 103(4):550-9. PubMed ID: 17395071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A simulator for maxillofacial surgery integrating 3D cephalometry and orthodontia.
Bettega G; Payan Y; Mollard B; Boyer A; Raphaël B; Lavallée S
Comput Aided Surg; 2000; 5(3):156-65. PubMed ID: 10964087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT.
Shaw K; McIntyre G; Mossey P; Menhinick A; Thomson D
J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 23524544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
