BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

3337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15979392)

  • 21. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies of antihypertensive agents.
    Brambilla G; Martelli A
    Mutat Res; 2006 Mar; 612(2):115-49. PubMed ID: 16458045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. GADD45a-GFP GreenScreen HC assay results for the ECVAM recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of new genotoxicity tests.
    Birrell L; Cahill P; Hughes C; Tate M; Walmsley RM
    Mutat Res; 2010 Jan; 695(1-2):87-95. PubMed ID: 20006735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of the sensitivity of the computational programs DEREK, TOPKAT, and MCASE in the prediction of the genotoxicity of pharmaceutical molecules.
    Snyder RD; Pearl GS; Mandakas G; Choy WN; Goodsaid F; Rosenblum IY
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 43(3):143-58. PubMed ID: 15065202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Further analysis of Ames-negative rodent carcinogens that are only genotoxic in mammalian cells in vitro at concentrations exceeding 1 mM, including retesting of compounds of concern.
    Kirkland D; Fowler P
    Mutagenesis; 2010 Nov; 25(6):539-53. PubMed ID: 20720197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. I. Choice of cell type.
    Fowler P; Smith K; Young J; Jeffrey L; Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Carmichael P
    Mutat Res; 2012 Feb; 742(1-2):11-25. PubMed ID: 22138618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Follow-up testing of rodent carcinogens not positive in the standard genotoxicity testing battery: IWGT workgroup report.
    Kasper P; Uno Y; Mauthe R; Asano N; Douglas G; Matthews E; Moore M; Mueller L; Nakajima M; Singer T; Speit G;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 17123861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo erythrocyte micronucleus and transgenic rodent gene mutation tests to detect rodent carcinogens.
    Morita T; Hamada S; Masumura K; Wakata A; Maniwa J; Takasawa H; Yasunaga K; Hashizume T; Honma M
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 May; 802():1-29. PubMed ID: 27169373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster and human cells: a comparison using compounds with various genotoxicity profiles.
    Hilliard C; Hill R; Armstrong M; Fleckenstein C; Crowley J; Freeland E; Duffy D; Galloway SM
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 616(1-2):103-18. PubMed ID: 17174355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds.
    Nesslany F; Zennouche N; Simar-Meintières S; Talahari I; Nkili-Mboui EN; Marzin D
    Mutat Res; 2007 Jun; 630(1-2):28-41. PubMed ID: 17507283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An analysis of results from 305 compounds tested with the yeast RAD54-GFP genotoxicity assay (GreenScreen GC)-including relative predictivity of regulatory tests and rodent carcinogenesis and performance with autofluorescent and coloured compounds.
    Knight AW; Billinton N; Cahill PA; Scott A; Harvey JS; Roberts KJ; Tweats DJ; Keenan PO; Walmsley RM
    Mutagenesis; 2007 Nov; 22(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 17906314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improvement of in vivo genotoxicity assessment: combination of acute tests and integration into standard toxicity testing.
    Rothfuss A; Honma M; Czich A; Aardema MJ; Burlinson B; Galloway S; Hamada S; Kirkland D; Heflich RH; Howe J; Nakajima M; O'Donovan M; Plappert-Helbig U; Priestley C; Recio L; Schuler M; Uno Y; Martus HJ
    Mutat Res; 2011 Aug; 723(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 21182982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of the natural neurotoxin Tetrodotoxin (TTX) in a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays.
    Guzmán A; Fernández de Henestrosa AR; Marín AP; Ho A; Borroto JI; Carasa I; Pritchard L
    Mutat Res; 2007 Dec; 634(1-2):14-24. PubMed ID: 17881283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of antipsychotics and antidepressants.
    Brambilla G; Mattioli F; Martelli A
    Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 261(3):77-88. PubMed ID: 19410629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Final report on the safety assessment of capsicum annuum extract, capsicum annuum fruit extract, capsicum annuum resin, capsicum annuum fruit powder, capsicum frutescens fruit, capsicum frutescens fruit extract, capsicum frutescens resin, and capsaicin.
    Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 1():3-106. PubMed ID: 17365137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of gastrointestinal drugs.
    Brambilla G; Mattioli F; Martelli A
    Mutagenesis; 2010 Jul; 25(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 20478972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of high-throughput genotoxicity assays used in profiling the US EPA ToxCast chemicals.
    Knight AW; Little S; Houck K; Dix D; Judson R; Richard A; McCarroll N; Akerman G; Yang C; Birrell L; Walmsley RM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Nov; 55(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 19591892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation. Part II: Performances of the in vitro micronucleus test compared to the mouse lymphoma assay and the in vitro chromosome aberration assay.
    Lorge E; Lambert C; Gervais V; Becourt-Lhote N; Delongeas JL; Claude N
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 Apr; 96(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 17192442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The challenge of testing chemicals for potential carcinogenicity using multiple short-term assays: an analysis of a proposed test battery for hair dyes.
    Rosenkranz HS; Cunningham SL; Mermelstein R; Cunningham AR
    Mutat Res; 2007 Sep; 633(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 17625954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 167.