These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15979772)
1. An alternative approach for the safety evaluation of new and existing chemicals, an exercise in integrated testing. Gubbels-van Hal WM; Blaauboer BJ; Barentsen HM; Hoitink MA; Meerts IA; van der Hoeven JC Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Aug; 42(3):284-95. PubMed ID: 15979772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH). Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Final report of the safety assessment of Alcohol Denat., including SD Alcohol 3-A, SD Alcohol 30, SD Alcohol 39, SD Alcohol 39-B, SD Alcohol 39-C, SD Alcohol 40, SD Alcohol 40-B, and SD Alcohol 40-C, and the denaturants, Quassin, Brucine Sulfate/Brucine, and Denatonium Benzoate. Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 1():1-43. PubMed ID: 18569160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemical reactivity indices and mechanism-based read-across for non-animal based assessment of skin sensitisation potential. Roberts DW; Aptula AO; Patlewicz G; Pease C J Appl Toxicol; 2008 May; 28(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 17703503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH--a summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME. Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod J Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():149-58. PubMed ID: 16555968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility. Dent MP Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling. Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute toxicity testing of chemicals-Opportunities to avoid redundant testing and use alternative approaches. Creton S; Dewhurst IC; Earl LK; Gehen SC; Guest RL; Hotchkiss JA; Indans I; Woolhiser MR; Billington R Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 40(1):50-83. PubMed ID: 20144136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Substance-tailored testing strategies in toxicology: an in silico methodology based on QSAR modeling of toxicological thresholds and Monte Carlo simulations of toxicological testing. Péry AR; Desmots S; Mombelli E Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 56(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 19766156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A feasibility study developing an integrated testing strategy assessing skin irritation potential of chemicals. Hoffmann S; Saliner AG; Patlewicz G; Eskes C; Zuang V; Worth AP Toxicol Lett; 2008 Jul; 180(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 18585875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: challenges and opportunities. Costa DL Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):105-9. PubMed ID: 18486462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulatory use of (Q)SARs in toxicological hazard assessment strategies. Gerner I; Spielmann H; Hoefer T; Liebsch M; Herzler M SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):359-66. PubMed ID: 15669695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment. Hareng L; Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Schwarz M; Hartung T Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 20(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 15899576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro dermal absorption rate testing of certain chemicals of interest to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration: summary and evaluation of USEPA's mandated testing. Fasano WJ; McDougal JN Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 18501488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Replacement of in vivo acute oral toxicity studies by in vitro cytotoxicity methods: opportunities, limits and regulatory status. Ukelis U; Kramer PJ; Olejniczak K; Mueller SO Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jun; 51(1):108-18. PubMed ID: 18362045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances. Simon-Hettich B; Rothfuss A; Steger-Hartmann T Toxicology; 2006 Jul; 224(1-2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16707203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Perspective of predictive toxicity assessment of in vivo repeated dose toxicity using structural activity relationship]. Ono A Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 2010; (128):44-9. PubMed ID: 21381395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]