These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15980258)

  • 1. Factors influencing reaction time during automated kinetic perimetry on the Tübingen computer campimeter.
    Becker ST; Vonthein R; Volpe NJ; Schiefer U
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2633-8. PubMed ID: 15980258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The normal age-corrected and reaction time-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry.
    Vonthein R; Rauscher S; Paetzold J; Nowomiejska K; Krapp E; Hermann A; Sadowski B; Chaumette C; Wild JM; Schiefer U
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17331580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reaction time in automated kinetic perimetry: effects of stimulus luminance, eccentricity, and movement direction.
    Schiefer U; Strasburger H; Becker ST; Vonthein R; Schiller J; Dietrich TJ; Hart W
    Vision Res; 2001 Jul; 41(16):2157-64. PubMed ID: 11403799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of extensive visual field defects with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry].
    Schiefer U; Schiller J; Paetzold J; Dietrich TJ; Vonthein R; Besch D
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jan; 218(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11225394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scotoma mapping by semi-automated kinetic perimetry: the effects of stimulus properties and the speed of subjects' responses.
    Dolderer J; Vonthein R; Johnson CA; Schiefer U; Hart W
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 16704695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaction time during semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in patients with advanced visual field loss.
    Nowomiejska K; Vonthein R; Paetzold J; Zagorski Z; Kardon R; Schiefer U
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 88(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 19094165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
    Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss.
    Nowomiejska K; Vonthein R; Paetzold J; Zagorski Z; Kardon R; Schiefer U
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1343-54. PubMed ID: 15996734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Fundus-oriented perimetry. Evaluation of a new visual field examination method for detecting angioscotoma].
    Schiefer U; Stercken-Sorrenti G; Dietrich TJ; Friedrich M; Benda N
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996; 209(2-3):62-71. PubMed ID: 8992085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus parameters for goldmann kinetic perimetry in nonorganic visual loss.
    Ebneter A; Pellanda N; Kunz A; Mojon S; Mojon DS
    Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 19738396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of physiologic statokinetic dissociation by automated perimetry.
    Hudson C; Wild JM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Oct; 33(11):3162-8. PubMed ID: 1399422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual field recovery after vision restoration therapy (VRT) is independent of eye movements: an eye tracker study.
    Kasten E; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16970999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inverse stimuli in perimetric performance reveal larger visual field defects: implications for vision restoration.
    Kasten E; Guenther T; Sabel BA
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008; 26(4-5):355-64. PubMed ID: 18997311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of stimulus velocity in automated kinetic perimetry in young healthy participants.
    Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Okada A; Takano K; Tomioka S
    Vision Res; 2014 May; 98():83-8. PubMed ID: 24705075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recovery of visual field defects: a large clinical observational study using vision restoration therapy.
    Mueller I; Mast H; Sabel BA
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(5-6):563-72. PubMed ID: 18334773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of an effective visual field testing strategy for a normal pediatric population.
    Akar Y; Yilmaz A; Yucel I
    Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 18617757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of stato-kinetic dissociation by semi-automated perimetry.
    Schiller J; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Hart WM; Kurtenbach A; Schiefer U
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):117-28. PubMed ID: 16260022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.