These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15980709)

  • 1. An evaluation of root ZX and elements diagnostic apex locators.
    Tselnik M; Baumgartner JC; Marshall JG
    J Endod; 2005 Jul; 31(7):507-9. PubMed ID: 15980709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators.
    Welk AR; Baumgartner JC; Marshall JG
    J Endod; 2003 Aug; 29(8):497-500. PubMed ID: 12929694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the accuracy of electronic apex locators Dentaport ZX and Ray Pex 4 under clinical conditions.
    Stavrianos C; Vladimirov SB; Vangelov LS; Papadopoulos C; Bouzala A
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2007; 49(3-4):75-9. PubMed ID: 18504939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators.
    Vieyra JP; Acosta J
    Int Endod J; 2011 Jun; 44(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 21306402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study.
    Kaufman AY; Keila S; Yoshpe M
    Int Endod J; 2002 Feb; 35(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11843975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vivo comparison of the Root ZX II, the Apex NRG XFR, and Mini Apex Locator by using rotary nickel-titanium files.
    Siu C; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):962-5. PubMed ID: 19567315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an ex vivo investigation.
    Venturi M; Breschi L
    Int Endod J; 2007 May; 40(5):362-73. PubMed ID: 17309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and two electronic apex locators.
    Vieyra JP; Acosta J; Mondaca JM
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jan; 43(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 20002800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of precision of length determination with 3 electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator, and RomiAPEX D-30.
    Bernardes RA; Duarte MA; Vasconcelos BC; Moraes IG; Bernardineli N; Garcia RB; Baldi JV; Victorino FR; Bramante CM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e91-4. PubMed ID: 17703968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo comparison of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators.
    Silveira LF; Petry FV; Martos J; Neto JB
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Aug; 37(2):70-2. PubMed ID: 21771186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ability of two apex locators to locate the apical foramen: an in vitro study.
    D'Assunção FL; de Albuquerque DS; de Queiroz Ferreira LC
    J Endod; 2006 Jun; 32(6):560-2. PubMed ID: 16728251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of root canal measurements using the Mini Apex Locator and Root ZX-II: an evaluation in vitro.
    D'Assunção FL; de Albuquerque DS; Salazar-Silva JR; de Queiroz Ferreira LC; Bezerra PM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):e50-3. PubMed ID: 17709069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of apical constriction diameter on Root ZX apex locator precision.
    Herrera M; Abalos C; Planas AJ; Llamas R
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):995-8. PubMed ID: 17878091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique.
    Kim E; Marmo M; Lee CY; Oh NS; Kim IK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):e79-83. PubMed ID: 18329572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy and coefficient of repeatability of three electronic apex locators using a simple mounting model: a preliminary report.
    D'Assunção FL; Albuquerque DS; Salazar-Silva JR; Dos Santos VC; Sousa JC
    Int Endod J; 2010 Apr; 43(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 20487445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Accuracy of 3 Electronic Apex Locators in Curved Canals of Mandibular Molars.
    Piasecki L; José Dos Reis P; Jussiani EI; Andrello AC
    J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1872-1877. PubMed ID: 30390968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of three electronic apex locators.
    Guise GM; Goodell GG; Imamura GM
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 20113790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic length measurement using small and large files in enlarged canals.
    Nguyen HQ; Kaufman AY; Komorowski RC; Friedman S
    Int Endod J; 1996 Nov; 29(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 10332234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the apical terminus of root-end resected teeth using three modern apex locators: a comparative ex vivo study.
    ElAyouti A; Kimionis I; Chu AL; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Nov; 38(11):827-33. PubMed ID: 16218976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators.
    Wrbas KT; Ziegler AA; Altenburger MJ; Schirrmeister JF
    Int Endod J; 2007 Feb; 40(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 17229119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.