These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15981403)

  • 1. Many scientists admit to misconduct: degrees of deception vary in poll; researchers say findings could hurt the field.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 2005 Jun; ():A3. PubMed ID: 15981403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mundane misdeeds skew findings, researchers say.
    Dean C
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Jun; ():F6. PubMed ID: 15966122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire--Revised (SMQ-R): validation and psychometric testing.
    Broome ME; Pryor E; Habermann B; Pulley L; Kincaid H
    Account Res; 2005; 12(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 16578917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fraud by scientists seen linked to competition.
    Russell C
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
    Keranen L
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of culture in research misconduct.
    Davis MS
    Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
    Tavare A
    BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientists behaving badly.
    Martinson BC; Anderson MS; de Vries R
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):737-8. PubMed ID: 15944677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical school guidelines for investigating misconduct and fraud in science.
    Annau Z
    Account Res; 1992; 2(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 11653980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stop misbehaving!
    Neill US
    J Clin Invest; 2006 Jul; 116(7):1740-1. PubMed ID: 16823470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
    Willcox BL
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
    Kuzma SM
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Korean scientist said to admit fabrication in a cloning study.
    Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():A1, A6. PubMed ID: 16450462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific misconduct: undue process.
    Efron R
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):223-38. PubMed ID: 11652297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Teaching scientific integrity.
    Gifford F
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fellow scientists begin to get suspicious about data.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisionist history sees Pasteur as liar who stole rival's ideas.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1995 May; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11647062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.