113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15981494)
1. [Effect of refraction procedures (LASIK) on various ocular functions (initial results)].
Hejcmanová M; Horácková M; Vlková E
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2005 May; 61(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 15981494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Effect of LASIK refractive procedures on visual functions in patients with myopia].
Hejcmanová M; Horácková M
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2006 May; 62(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 16758761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of visual function in myopia over -6.0 dpt after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis].
Langrová H; Hejcmanová D; Peregrin J; Feuermannová A; Rozsíval P
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2001 Sep; 57(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 11764685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
Montés-Micó R; Rodríguez-Galietero A; Alió JL
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors.
Alió JL; Montés-Mico R
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16378639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
Tobaigy FM; Ghanem RC; Sayegh RR; Hallak JA; Azar DT
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration.
Zhang J; Zhou YH; Wang NL; Li R
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Jan; 121(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 18272040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.
Katsanevaki VJ; Kalyvianaki MI; Kavroulaki DS; Pallikaris IG
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 17320960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of spectacle-related changes in retinal image size on contrast sensitivity function after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Lackner B; Pieh S; Funovics MA; Schmidinger G; Franz C; Simader C; Skorpik C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):626-32. PubMed ID: 15050259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flap LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractive keratectomy.
Slade SG; Durrie DS; Binder PS
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1075-82. PubMed ID: 19486798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Visual function in high myopia corrected with anterior chamber phakic lens (PK PIOL). Initial results].
Bytton L; Hejcmanová D; Langrová H; Rozsíval P; Feuermannová A; Hejcmanová M
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2003 Sep; 59(5):340-7. PubMed ID: 14518362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia.
Sanders D; Vukich JA
Cornea; 2006 Dec; 25(10):1139-46. PubMed ID: 17172886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK.
Kaiserman I; Hazarbassanov R; Varssano D; Grinbaum A
Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):454-7. PubMed ID: 15019318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Chung SH; Lee IS; Lee YG; Lee HK; Kim EK; Yoon G; Seo KY
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of wavefront-optimized surface ablation.
Randleman JB; Loft ES; Banning CS; Lynn MJ; Stulting RD
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):983-8. PubMed ID: 17337064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and refractive outcomes.
Cobo-Soriano R; Calvo MA; Beltrán J; Llovet FL; Baviera J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1357-65. PubMed ID: 16105607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Contrast sensitivity function in myopic LASIK].
Yan Z; Hu J; Gu X; Sun M; Yang L
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 38(11):677-9. PubMed ID: 12487899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and the contrast sensitivity function.
Quesnel NM; Lovasik JV; Ferremi C; Boileau M; Ieraci C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1209-18. PubMed ID: 15177594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
Kalyvianaki MI; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Panagopoulou SI; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG
Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
