These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15981716)

  • 1. Colon dissection: a new three-dimensional reconstruction tool for computed tomography colonography.
    Röttgen R; Fischbach F; Plotkin M; Herzog H; Freund T; Schröder RJ; Felix R
    Acta Radiol; 2005 May; 46(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 15981716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
    Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT colonography using different reconstruction modi.
    Röttgen R; Fischbach F; Plotkin M; Lorenz M; Freund T; Schröder RJ; Felix RR
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 15855065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.
    Hoppe H; Quattropani C; Spreng A; Mattich J; Netzer P; Dinkel HP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1151-8. PubMed ID: 15100110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps.
    Juchems MS; Fleiter TR; Pauls S; Schmidt SA; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 16402257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
    Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colonic surveillance by CT colonography using axial images only.
    Bruzzi JF; Moss AC; Brennan DD; MacMathuna P; Fenlon HM
    Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):763-7. PubMed ID: 14986051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
    Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions.
    Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; López EM; Ulla M; Castiglioni R; Carrascosa J
    Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 17143581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colorectal polyp detection with virtual colonoscopy (computed tomographic colonography); the reliability of the method.
    Xynopoulos D; Stasinopoulou M; Dimitroulopoulos D; Tsamakides K; Arhavlis E; Kontou M; Tavernaraki A; Paraskevas E
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(43):124-7. PubMed ID: 11941935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
    Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle.
    Pickhardt PJ; Schumacher C; Kim DH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 19638863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps.
    Yun JY; Ro HJ; Park JB; Choi JB; Chung JE; Kim YJ; Suh WH; Lee JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 18071278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps.
    Macari M; Milano A; Lavelle M; Berman P; Megibow AJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 10845478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies.
    Beaulieu CF; Jeffrey RB; Karadi C; Paik DS; Napel S
    Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 10405743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
    Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search?
    Johnson KT; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W172-6. PubMed ID: 17885028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Registration of the endoluminal surfaces of the colon derived from prone and supine CT colonography.
    Roth HR; McClelland JR; Boone DJ; Modat M; Cardoso MJ; Hampshire TE; Hu M; Punwani S; Ourselin S; Slabaugh GG; Halligan S; Hawkes DJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3077-89. PubMed ID: 21815381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
    Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
    Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.