These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15982124)

  • 1. Reduced Stroop interference for opponent colors may be due to input factors: evidence from individual differences and a neural network simulation.
    Laeng B; Låg T; Brennen T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):438-52. PubMed ID: 15982124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transitions between color categories mapped with a reverse Stroop task.
    Smithson HE; Khan SS; Sharpe LT; Stockman A
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16961980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task.
    Hanslmayr S; Pastötter B; Bäuml KH; Gruber S; Wimber M; Klimesch W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 18275330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introducing a new computer-based test for the clinical evaluation of color discrimination.
    Melamud A; Simpson E; Traboulsi EI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):953-60. PubMed ID: 17157581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural mechanisms of cognitive control: an integrative model of stroop task performance and FMRI data.
    Herd SA; Banich MT; O'Reilly RC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 16417680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Color opponency in synaesthetic experiences.
    Nikolić D; Lichti P; Singer W
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jun; 18(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 17576258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading ability is negatively related to Stroop interference.
    Protopapas A; Archonti A; Skaloumbakas C
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 May; 54(3):251-82. PubMed ID: 16962090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dissociation of neural circuits in a Stroop task.
    Xiao X; Qiu J; Zhang Q
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(7):674-8. PubMed ID: 19349920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individualized EEG source reconstruction of Stroop interference with masked color words.
    Bruchmann M; Herper K; Konrad C; Pantev C; Huster RJ
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1800-9. PubMed ID: 19781651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation.
    Lansbergen MM; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2247-54. PubMed ID: 18762447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response variations to Stroop color-word stimuli.
    Izawa C; Silver NC
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1988 May; 114(2):211-55. PubMed ID: 3402729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
    Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of color constancy with a neural network.
    Stanikunas R; Vaitkevicius H; Kulikowski JJ
    Neural Netw; 2004 Apr; 17(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 15037351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
    Schmidt JR; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 18444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19963201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A preliminary investigation on the relationship between color-word Stroop task performance and delusion-proneness in nonpsychiatric adults.
    Orem DM; Bedwell JS
    Psychiatry Res; 2010 Jan; 175(1-2):27-32. PubMed ID: 19913920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.