These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15982129)

  • 1. The integration of object levels and their content: a theory of global/local processing and related hemispheric differences.
    Hübner R; Volberg G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):520-41. PubMed ID: 15982129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of local features to a global percept by neural coupling.
    Rose M; Sommer T; Büchel C
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Oct; 16(10):1522-8. PubMed ID: 16339083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional hemispheric asymmetries of global/local processing mirrored by the steady-state visual evoked potential.
    Martens U; Hübner R
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Mar; 81(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 23246827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cerebral hemispheres differ in their capacity for content-to-level binding but not for identification: evidence from conjunction errors obtained with bilateral hierarchical stimuli.
    Kruse R; Hübner R
    Laterality; 2012; 17(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 22973814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology.
    Lux S; Marshall JC; Thimm M; Fink GR
    Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18387528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioral and physiological findings of gender differences in global-local visual processing.
    Roalf D; Lowery N; Turetsky BI
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Feb; 60(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 16271817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of local and global processing demands on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Oct; 59(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 16019116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional hemispheric differences for the categorization of global and local information in naturalistic stimuli.
    Hübner R; Studer T
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Feb; 69(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 18550242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing: still unclear.
    Boles DB; Karner TA
    Brain Cogn; 1996 Mar; 30(2):232-43. PubMed ID: 8812001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory.
    Schendan HE; Kutas M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):734-49. PubMed ID: 17488201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between local and global processing and the processing of high and low spatial frequencies studied by event-related potentials and source modeling.
    Boeschoten MA; Kemner C; Kenemans JL; Engeland Hv
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 15993761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lateral masking, levels of processing and stimulus category: a comparative study between normal and dyslexic readers.
    Pernet C; Valdois S; Celsis P; Démonet JF
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2374-85. PubMed ID: 16777147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychophysics reveals a right hemispheric contribution to body image distortions in women but not men.
    Mohr C; Porter G; Benton CP
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):2942-50. PubMed ID: 17658560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Object substitution masking induced by illusory masks: evidence for higher object-level locus of interference.
    Hirose N; Osaka N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):931-8. PubMed ID: 19653739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of temporal integration on the shape of visual backward masking functions.
    Francis G; Cho YS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1116-28. PubMed ID: 18823199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual field x response hand interactions and level priming in the processing of laterally presented hierarchical stimuli.
    Wendt M; Vietze I; Kluwe RH
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16901597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.