159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15982130)
1. Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions.
Mortier K; Theeuwes J; Starreveld P
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):542-57. PubMed ID: 15982130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.
Muller HJ; Reimann B; Krummenacher J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sources of top-down control in visual search.
Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?
Becker SI
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1417-40. PubMed ID: 19045983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feature integration theory revisited: dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search.
Chan LK; Hayward WG
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):119-32. PubMed ID: 19170475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impaired filtering of behaviourally irrelevant visual information in dyslexia.
Roach NW; Hogben JH
Brain; 2007 Mar; 130(Pt 3):771-85. PubMed ID: 17237361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of within-dimension singleton priming in visual search.
Lamy D; Bar-Anan Y; Egeth HE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):268-85. PubMed ID: 18377170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
Schubö A; Müller HJ
Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Top-down weighting of visual dimensions: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Töllner T; Zehetleitner M; Gramann K; Müller HJ
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1372-81. PubMed ID: 19925821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-trial and redundant-signals effects in visual search and discrimination tasks: separable pre-attentive and post-selective effects.
Krummenacher J; Grubert A; Müller HJ
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1382-95. PubMed ID: 20382173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search.
Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Kenner N; Hyle M; Vasan N
Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1411-26. PubMed ID: 15066400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
Lamy D; Yashar A
Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual search deficits in Parkinson's disease are attenuated by bottom-up target salience and top-down information.
Horowitz TS; Choi WY; Horvitz JC; Côté LJ; Mangels JA
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1962-77. PubMed ID: 16580700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
Snow JC; Mattingley JB
Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of the cholinergic agonist nicotine on reorienting of visual spatial attention and top-down attentional control.
Thiel CM; Fink GR
Neuroscience; 2008 Mar; 152(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18272290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contextual cueing of pop-out visual search: when context guides the deployment of attention.
Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):20. PubMed ID: 20616131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds.
Dalton P; Lavie N
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 14769076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Featural guidance in conjunction search: the contrast between orientation and color.
Anderson GM; Heinke D; Humphreys GW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1108-27. PubMed ID: 20718568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
