These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15982130)

  • 21. Clear distinction between preattentive and attentive process in schizophrenia by visual search performance.
    Tanaka G; Mori S; Inadomi H; Hamada Y; Ohta Y; Ozawa H
    Psychiatry Res; 2007 Jan; 149(1-3):25-31. PubMed ID: 17123633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of action video game experience on the time course of inhibition of return and the efficiency of visual search.
    Castel AD; Pratt J; Drummond E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Jun; 119(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 15877981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electrophysiological correlates of detecting a visual target and detecting its absence: the role of feature dimensions.
    Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3365-70. PubMed ID: 20633570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Action modulates object-based selection.
    Linnell KJ; Humphreys GW; McIntyre DB; Laitinen S; Wing AM
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2268-86. PubMed ID: 15924941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
    Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Partial repetition costs persist in nonsearch compound tasks: evidence for multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis.
    Zehetleitner M; Rangelov D; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 22391894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional mechanisms in simple visual detection: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.
    Liu CC; Wolfgang BJ; Smith PL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1329-45. PubMed ID: 19803640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process?
    Handy TC; Khoe W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1936-49. PubMed ID: 16356330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanisms of the associated nontargets effect: processes influenced by statistical learning in a simple visual environment.
    Reynolds A; Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):837-59. PubMed ID: 17514597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dimension intertrial and cueing effects in localization: support for pre-attentively weighted one-route models of saliency.
    Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Geyer T; Hegenloh M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):349-63. PubMed ID: 21264729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.
    Busey T; Palmer J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):790-810. PubMed ID: 18665726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions.
    Proulx MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17311478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dimension-specific intertrial priming effects are task-specific: evidence for multiple weighting systems.
    Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):100-14. PubMed ID: 20731506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.
    Starreveld PA; Theeuwes J; Mortier K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):56-78. PubMed ID: 14769068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.