These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15982134)

  • 1. Speeded classification in a probabilistic category structure: contrasting exemplar-retrieval, decision-boundary, and prototype models.
    Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):608-29. PubMed ID: 15982134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification response times in probabilistic rule-based category structures: contrasting exemplar-retrieval and decision-boundary models.
    Nosofsky RM; Little DR
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Oct; 38(7):916-27. PubMed ID: 20921104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limitations of exemplar models of multi-attribute probabilistic inference.
    Nosofsky RM; Bergert FB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):999-1019. PubMed ID: 17983309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.
    Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):924-40. PubMed ID: 12219799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speeded old-new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels.
    Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 16634673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classification of faces in man and machine.
    Graf AB; Wichmann FA; Bülthoff HH; Schölkopf B
    Neural Comput; 2006 Jan; 18(1):143-65. PubMed ID: 16354384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overconfidence effects in category learning: a comparison of connectionist and exemplar memory models.
    Sieck WR; Yates JF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):1003-21. PubMed ID: 11486916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal dynamics of decision-making during motion perception in the visual cortex.
    Grossberg S; Pilly PK
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(12):1345-73. PubMed ID: 18452967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use.
    Pachur T; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):983-1002. PubMed ID: 16938041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exemplars, prototypes, and the flexibility of classification models.
    Olsson H; Wennerholm P; Lyxzèn U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):936-41. PubMed ID: 15238035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncovering contrast categories in categorization with a probabilistic threshold model.
    Verheyen S; De Deyne S; Dry MJ; Storms G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1515-31. PubMed ID: 21767056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequence-sensitive exemplar and decision-bound accounts of speeded-classification performance in a modified Garner-tasks paradigm.
    Little DR; Wang T; Nosofsky RM
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():1-38. PubMed ID: 27472912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing exemplar-retrieval and decision-bound models of speeded perceptual classification.
    Nosofsky RM; Palmeri TJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Oct; 59(7):1027-48. PubMed ID: 9360476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An exemplar account of the bow and set-size effects in absolute identification.
    Kent C; Lamberts K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):289-305. PubMed ID: 15755246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making.
    Bergert FB; Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):107-29. PubMed ID: 17201556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries.
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probability assessment with response times and confidence in perception and knowledge.
    Petrusic WM; Baranski JV
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 19081556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Garner and congruence effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals.
    Patching GR; Quinlan PT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Aug; 28(4):755-75. PubMed ID: 12190249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.