These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15983771)

  • 21. The effect of familiarity on face adaptation.
    Laurence S; Hole G
    Perception; 2011; 40(4):450-63. PubMed ID: 21805920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ERP study of viewpoint-independence in familiar-face recognition.
    Miyakoshi M; Kanayama N; Nomura M; Iidaka T; Ohira H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Aug; 69(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 18474403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review.
    Johnston RA; Edmonds AJ
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):577-96. PubMed ID: 19548173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of motion at encoding and retrieval for same- and other-race face recognition.
    Butcher N; Lander K; Fang H; Costen N
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 102(4):931-42. PubMed ID: 21988393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1320-9. PubMed ID: 23583970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term expertise with artificial objects increases visual competition with early face categorization processes.
    Rossion B; Collins D; Goffaux V; Curran T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):543-55. PubMed ID: 17335400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception.
    Rossion B; Schiltz C; Robaye L; Pirenne D; Crommelinck M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):1019-34. PubMed ID: 11595103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 22642217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relating brain signal variability to knowledge representation.
    Heisz JJ; Shedden JM; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(3):1384-92. PubMed ID: 22906786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance.
    Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2027-40. PubMed ID: 20362599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of beliefs about face recognition ability on memory retrieval processes in young and older adults.
    Humphries JE; Flowe HD; Hall LC; Williams LC; Ryder HL
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):334-47. PubMed ID: 25671575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integration of faces and voices, but not faces and names, in person recognition.
    O'Mahony C; Newell FN
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 22229775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exploring the motion advantage: evaluating the contribution of familiarity and differences in facial motion.
    Butcher N; Lander K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):919-929. PubMed ID: 26822035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 'What is more familiar than I? Self, other and familiarity in schizophrenia.
    Ameller A; Dereux A; Dubertret C; Vaiva G; Thomas P; Pins D
    Schizophr Res; 2015 Feb; 161(2-3):501-5. PubMed ID: 25533594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M; Havard C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21459354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What the study of voice recognition in normal subjects and brain-damaged patients tells us about models of familiar people recognition.
    Gainotti G
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2273-82. PubMed ID: 21569784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.