These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15984397)

  • 1. Randomized crossover comparison of adhesively coupled colostomy pouching systems.
    Berg K; Seidler H
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Mar; 51(3):30-2, 34, 36 passim. PubMed ID: 15984397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ostomy bag management: comparative study of a new one-piece closed bag.
    Voergaard LL; Vendelbo G; Carlsen B; Jacobsen L; Nissen B; Mortensen J; Hansen G; Bach K; Baech SB
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Jan 25-Feb 7; 16(2):95-6, 98-101. PubMed ID: 17353819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective multicenter evaluation of a moldable stoma skin barrier.
    Hoeflok J; Guy D; Allen S; St-Cyr D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 May; 55(5):62-9. PubMed ID: 19471050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Observational study for evaluation of the efficacy of a new colostomy pouch].
    Sánchez Crisol I
    Rev Enferm; 1998 Sep; 21(241):55-61. PubMed ID: 9807511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical evaluation of a new device for patients with colostomies].
    Centellas Morral M
    Rev Enferm; 2000 Apr; 23(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 10909356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Body Fit With a Pouching System With Concave Contour for People With an Outward Peristomal Body Profile: Effects on Leakage, Wear Time, and Quality of Life: A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial.
    Rolfsen T; Vestergaard M; Hansen MF; Boisen EB; Dambæk MR
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 51(4):303-311. PubMed ID: 39037163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in Ostomy Pouch Seal Leakage Occurrences Between North American and European Residents.
    Fellows J; Forest Lalande L; Martins L; Steen A; Størling ZM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 28267122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of two-piece ostomy appliances.
    Welser M; Riedlinger I; Prause U
    Br J Nurs; 2009 May 14-27; 18(9):530, 532, 534 passim. PubMed ID: 19448579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical study: peristomal skin irritation in colostomy patients.
    Burt-McAliley D; Eberhardt D; van Rijswijk L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994; 40(6):28-30, 32-4, 36-7. PubMed ID: 7880370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency of peristomal complications.
    Ratliff CR; Donovan AM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Aug; 47(8):26-9. PubMed ID: 11890000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disposable plastic liners for a colostomy appliance: a controlled trial and follow-up survey of convenience, satisfaction, and costs.
    Kelly AW; Nelson ML; Heppell J; Weaver A; Hentz J
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Sep; 27(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 10999966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ostomy pouch wear time in the United States.
    Richbourg L; Fellows J; Arroyave WD
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(5):504-8. PubMed ID: 18794702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Descriptive study of peristomal complications.
    Ratliff CR; Scarano KA; Donovan AM; Colwell JC
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2005; 32(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15718955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A convex urostomy pouch with adhesive border: a patient survey.
    McPhail J; Nichols T; Menier M
    Br J Nurs; 2014 Dec 11-2015 Jan 7; 23(22):1182-6. PubMed ID: 25492431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transdermal buprenorphine patches applied in a 4-day regimen versus a 3-day regimen: a single-site, Phase III, randomized, open-label, crossover comparison.
    Likar R; Lorenz V; Korak-Leiter M; Kager I; Sittl R
    Clin Ther; 2007 Aug; 29(8):1591-606. PubMed ID: 17919542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
    Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors impacting the quality of life of people with an ostomy in North America: results from the Dialogue Study.
    Erwin-Toth P; Thompson SJ; Davis JS
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(4):417-22; quiz 423-4. PubMed ID: 22652937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [To evaluate the quality of life and peristomal skin ostomy patient with the new device Sensura].
    Crespo Fontán B; Caparrós Sanz MR; Lainez Pardos PL; Davín Durban I
    Rev Enferm; 2010 Oct; 33(10):16-22. PubMed ID: 21137520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peristomal skin care: an overview of available products.
    Black P
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Sep 27-Oct 10; 16(17):1048, 1050, 1052-4 passim. PubMed ID: 18026049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and efficacy of a novel continence device in colostomy patients.
    Maxwell TR; Taylor D; Durnal AM; Wills R; Kommala D; Wade S
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1422-31. PubMed ID: 20847625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.