BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15984397)

  • 1. Randomized crossover comparison of adhesively coupled colostomy pouching systems.
    Berg K; Seidler H
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Mar; 51(3):30-2, 34, 36 passim. PubMed ID: 15984397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ostomy bag management: comparative study of a new one-piece closed bag.
    Voergaard LL; Vendelbo G; Carlsen B; Jacobsen L; Nissen B; Mortensen J; Hansen G; Bach K; Baech SB
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Jan 25-Feb 7; 16(2):95-6, 98-101. PubMed ID: 17353819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective multicenter evaluation of a moldable stoma skin barrier.
    Hoeflok J; Guy D; Allen S; St-Cyr D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 May; 55(5):62-9. PubMed ID: 19471050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Observational study for evaluation of the efficacy of a new colostomy pouch].
    Sánchez Crisol I
    Rev Enferm; 1998 Sep; 21(241):55-61. PubMed ID: 9807511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical evaluation of a new device for patients with colostomies].
    Centellas Morral M
    Rev Enferm; 2000 Apr; 23(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 10909356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in Ostomy Pouch Seal Leakage Occurrences Between North American and European Residents.
    Fellows J; Forest Lalande L; Martins L; Steen A; Størling ZM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 28267122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of two-piece ostomy appliances.
    Welser M; Riedlinger I; Prause U
    Br J Nurs; 2009 May 14-27; 18(9):530, 532, 534 passim. PubMed ID: 19448579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical study: peristomal skin irritation in colostomy patients.
    Burt-McAliley D; Eberhardt D; van Rijswijk L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994; 40(6):28-30, 32-4, 36-7. PubMed ID: 7880370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency of peristomal complications.
    Ratliff CR; Donovan AM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Aug; 47(8):26-9. PubMed ID: 11890000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disposable plastic liners for a colostomy appliance: a controlled trial and follow-up survey of convenience, satisfaction, and costs.
    Kelly AW; Nelson ML; Heppell J; Weaver A; Hentz J
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Sep; 27(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 10999966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ostomy pouch wear time in the United States.
    Richbourg L; Fellows J; Arroyave WD
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(5):504-8. PubMed ID: 18794702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Descriptive study of peristomal complications.
    Ratliff CR; Scarano KA; Donovan AM; Colwell JC
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2005; 32(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15718955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A convex urostomy pouch with adhesive border: a patient survey.
    McPhail J; Nichols T; Menier M
    Br J Nurs; 2014 Dec 11-2015 Jan 7; 23(22):1182-6. PubMed ID: 25492431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transdermal buprenorphine patches applied in a 4-day regimen versus a 3-day regimen: a single-site, Phase III, randomized, open-label, crossover comparison.
    Likar R; Lorenz V; Korak-Leiter M; Kager I; Sittl R
    Clin Ther; 2007 Aug; 29(8):1591-606. PubMed ID: 17919542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
    Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors impacting the quality of life of people with an ostomy in North America: results from the Dialogue Study.
    Erwin-Toth P; Thompson SJ; Davis JS
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(4):417-22; quiz 423-4. PubMed ID: 22652937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [To evaluate the quality of life and peristomal skin ostomy patient with the new device Sensura].
    Crespo Fontán B; Caparrós Sanz MR; Lainez Pardos PL; Davín Durban I
    Rev Enferm; 2010 Oct; 33(10):16-22. PubMed ID: 21137520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peristomal skin care: an overview of available products.
    Black P
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Sep 27-Oct 10; 16(17):1048, 1050, 1052-4 passim. PubMed ID: 18026049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and efficacy of a novel continence device in colostomy patients.
    Maxwell TR; Taylor D; Durnal AM; Wills R; Kommala D; Wade S
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1422-31. PubMed ID: 20847625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a new ostomy mouldable seal: an international product evaluation.
    Tielemans C; Probert R; Forest-Lalande L; Hansen AS; Aggerholm S; Ajslev TA
    Br J Nurs; 2016 Dec; 25(22):S16-S22. PubMed ID: 27935356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.