These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15984690)

  • 1. Dose sculpting with generalized equivalent uniform dose.
    Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Liu HH; Dong L; Mohan R; Wu Y
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 15984690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization with gEUD-guided dose-volume objectives.
    Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Wu Y; Zhou J; Liu HH; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 12608607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
    Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speed and convergence properties of gradient algorithms for optimization of IMRT.
    Zhang X; Liu H; Wang X; Dong L; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15191303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential for dose-escalation and reduction of risk in pancreatic cancer using IMRT optimization with lexicographic ordering and gEUD-based cost functions.
    Spalding AC; Jee KW; Vineberg K; Jablonowski M; Fraass BA; Pan CC; Lawrence TS; Haken RK; Ben-Josef E
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):521-9. PubMed ID: 17388169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From physical dose constraints to equivalent uniform dose constraints in inverse radiotherapy planning.
    Thieke C; Bortfeld T; Niemierko A; Nill S
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2332-9. PubMed ID: 14528955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved critical structure sparing with biologically based IMRT optimization.
    Qi XS; Semenenko VA; Li XA
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1790-9. PubMed ID: 19544798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization with gEUD-based objectives by means of simulated annealing.
    Hartmann M; Bogner L
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2041-9. PubMed ID: 18561680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
    Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A gEUD-based inverse planning technique for HDR prostate brachytherapy: feasibility study.
    Giantsoudi D; Baltas D; Karabis A; Mavroidis P; Zamboglou N; Tselis N; Shi C; Papanikolaou N
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041704. PubMed ID: 23556874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A sensitivity-guided algorithm for automated determination of IMRT objective function parameters.
    Zhang X; Wang X; Dong L; Liu H; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2935-44. PubMed ID: 16964872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esophagus sparing with IMRT in lung tumor irradiation: an EUD-based optimization technique.
    Chapet O; Thomas E; Kessler ML; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep; 63(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 16111587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients.
    Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Lerma F; Wu Y; Fatyga M; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4033-43. PubMed ID: 17153383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of effective decision criteria for multiobjective optimization in IMRT.
    Holdsworth C; Stewart RD; Kim M; Liao J; Phillips MH
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2964-74. PubMed ID: 21815370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a way to simplify IMRT.
    Ludlum E; Xia P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):807-21. PubMed ID: 18199916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving IMRT delivery efficiency using intensity limits during inverse planning.
    Coselmon MM; Moran JM; Radawski JD; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1234-45. PubMed ID: 15984674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A role for biological optimization within the current treatment planning paradigm.
    Das S
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4672-82. PubMed ID: 19928099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of fixed-beam IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and IMPT for selected cases.
    Muzik J; Soukup M; Alber M
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1580-92. PubMed ID: 18491552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.