214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15986525)
1. Science, fraud and the Baltimore case.
Bernstein J
Commentary; 1998 Dec; 106(6):40-4. PubMed ID: 15986525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
LaFollette MC
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
Resnik DB
Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Process and detection in fraud and deceit.
Silverman S
Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Academics face abuse of rules designed to protect research.
Cowen RC
Christ Sci Monitor; 1998 Mar; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time.
Edsall JT
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 11657783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On being an authentic scientist.
Smith ML
IRB; 1992; 14(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fraud in medical research.
Lock S
Issues Med Ethics; 1997; 5(4):112-4. PubMed ID: 16267905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be.
Interlandi J
N Y Times Mag; 2006 Oct; ():98-103. PubMed ID: 17115505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest.
Cohen P
New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Looking back at the 1987 Cervical Cancer Inquiry.
Williams L
N Z Med J; 2004 Sep; 117(1202):U1084; author reply U1084. PubMed ID: 15477915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 1: the spectrum of deviant behavior in science.
Garfield E
Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(14):3-7. PubMed ID: 11649955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?
Garfield E
Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fellow scientists begin to get suspicious about data.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Glory days or the lure of scientific misconduct.
Knoll E
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11653392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Scientific fraud].
Mamianetti A
Medicina (B Aires); 2016; 76(6):410. PubMed ID: 27959856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical and scientific fraud.
Robinson RG
N Z Med J; 1994 Jun; 107(979):216-7. PubMed ID: 8208480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The fraud of Abderhalden's enzymes.
Deichmann U; Müller-Hill B
Nature; 1998 May; 393(6681):109-11. PubMed ID: 9603512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics and fraud in science: a review of scientific misconduct and applications to craniofacial research.
Eliades T; Athanasiou AE; Papadopulos JS
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 16164106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
