These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15986525)

  • 21. How far do you trust your colleagues?
    Neufeld A
    New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retractions of the year.
    Nat Med; 2010 Dec; 16(12):1363. PubMed ID: 21135834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Scientific misconduct: A major threat for medical research].
    Barde F; Peiffer-Smadja N; de La Blanchardière A
    Rev Med Interne; 2020 May; 41(5):330-334. PubMed ID: 32107052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. University forced to pay $1.6 million to researcher.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Aug; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The assistant was guilty? On the erotic of fraud in science].
    Werner P
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(4):Oa1-2. PubMed ID: 9795421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When extra authors get in on the act.
    Tarnow E
    Nature; 1999 Apr; 398(6729):657. PubMed ID: 11645150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survey of Dutch doctors finds evidence of widespread research misconduct.
    Sheldon T
    BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2898. PubMed ID: 22522820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mystery fraud accusations.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7319):1020. PubMed ID: 20981065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Riddle of the tenth man.
    Hall ET
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):728. PubMed ID: 8657267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reactions to the Hwang scandal.
    Kwok LS
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):606-7. PubMed ID: 16459362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now?
    Powell K
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Was the paper I wrote a fraud?
    Bowie C
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1755-6. PubMed ID: 11682718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cervical Cancer Inquiry.
    Baird T
    N Z Med J; 2004 Oct; 117(1204):U1136. PubMed ID: 15505677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The changing face of scientific misconduct.
    Bevan D
    Clin Invest Med; 2004 Jun; 27(3):117-9. PubMed ID: 15305801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Truth and trustworthiness in research.
    Whitbeck C
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 11657785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tempests in a test tube: two new studies ask why scientists cheat.
    Begley S
    Newsweek; 1987 Feb; 109(5):64. PubMed ID: 11649813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. German task force outraged by changes to science fraud report.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6867):3. PubMed ID: 11780073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How to cope with fraud in science.
    New Sci; 1983 Jan; 97(1339):3. PubMed ID: 11655521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stop misbehaving!
    Neill US
    J Clin Invest; 2006 Jul; 116(7):1740-1. PubMed ID: 16823470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Empirical truth and progress in science.
    Evans C
    New Sci; 1984 Jan; 101(1394):43-5. PubMed ID: 11655576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.